Literature DB >> 12111630

Systems to assess the progression of finger joint osteoarthritis and the effects of disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs.

G Verbruggen1, S Goemaere, E M Veys.   

Abstract

Our objective was to assess the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) using scoring systems based on the anatomical changes recorded in the finger joints on standard radiographs and to test how far these scoring systems could be used to evaluate the effects of candidate "disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs" (DMOAD). The appearance and growth of osteophytes, narrowing of the joint space and subchondral bone changes allowed the classic OA-associated anatomical lesions to be used to score the progression of finger joint OA. Progression of OA in the finger joints was also assessed by the their evolution through previously described and predictable anatomical phases on standard X-rays. These phases were characterised by complete loss of the joint space preceding or coinciding with the appearance of subchondral cysts eroding the entire subchondral plate, and have been described in "inflammatory" or "erosive" OA. The erosive episodes were followed by processes of remodelling. In order to interfere with the progression of osteoarthritis, two chondroitin sulphates with possible DMOAD effects were used in two series of patients with OA of the finger joints. The patients were included in two separate randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trials: 46 of them received chondroitin polysulphate and 34 received chondroitin sulphate. Eighty-five patients were kept on placebo medication and were used as controls. All 165 patients were followed for 3 years. Posteroanterior X-rays of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal (IP) finger joints were obtained at the start of this prospective study and at yearly intervals thereafter. Almost 80% of the distal IP and 50% of the proximal IP were affected at study entry. In approximately 40% of the patients the classic picture of OA of the IP joints was complicated by manifest erosive OA changes. The two systems to score the progression of OA (Anatomical Lesion and Anatomical Phase Progression Score System) showed definite progression within 3 years of follow-up, especially in the IP joints. When compared with the placebo controls, none of the chondroitin sulphates prevented OA from occurring in previously normal finger joints. However, when the classic OA-associated anatomical lesions were considered, OA was less progressive in both active treatment groups. Furthermore, fewer patients from both chondroitin sulphate- and chondroitin polysulphate-treated groups developed "erosive" osteoarthritis. In conclusion, conventional radiographs can be used to assess the morbidity and progression of hand OA. The systems used to score the progression of finger joint OA allowed the DMOAD effects of both chondroitin sulphates to be evaluated. The data recorded during these pilot studies should help investigators to design future long-term clinical experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111630     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-002-8290-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  21 in total

1.  Erosive osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and pseudogout; a casual association?

Authors:  Ariela Hoxha; Amelia Ruffatti; Enrico Alberioli; Mariagrazia Lorenzin; Francesca Oliviero; Elena Mattia; Leonardo Punzi; Roberta Ramonda
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  State-of-the-art disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs.

Authors:  Roland W Moskowitz; Michele Hooper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  [Quantitative imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: from scoring to measurement].

Authors:  P Peloschek; G Langs; A Valentinitsch; M Bubale; T Schlager; C Müller-Mang; F Kainberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Chondroitin for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Shahrzad Noorbaloochi; Roderick MacDonald; Lara J Maxwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 5.  Pharmacological therapies for osteoarthritis of the hand: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Roy D Altman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Hand osteoarthritis-nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments.

Authors:  Margreet Kloppenburg
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Joint and bone assessment in hand osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Roberta Ramonda; Paola Frallonardo; Estella Musacchio; Stefania Vio; Leonardo Punzi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; B F Leeb; L Alekseeva; N K Arden; J W Bijlsma; F Dinçer; K Dziedzic; H J Häuselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; P Kaklamanis; S Lohmander; E Maheu; E Martín-Mola; K Pavelka; L Punzi; S Reiter; J Sautner; J Smolen; G Verbruggen; I Zimmermann-Górska
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Correlation of pain relief with physical function in hand osteoarthritis: randomized controlled trial post hoc analysis.

Authors:  H Richard Barthel; John H Peniston; Michael B Clark; Morris S Gold; Roy D Altman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Morbid anatomy of 'erosive osteoarthritis' of the interphalangeal finger joints: an optimised scoring system to monitor disease progression in affected joints.

Authors:  Gust Verbruggen; Ruth Wittoek; Bert Vander Cruyssen; Dirk Elewaut
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.