Literature DB >> 12111581

Quantitative detection of disseminated cancer cells in the greater omentum of gastric carcinoma patients with real-time RT-PCR: a comparison with peritoneal lavage cytology.

Yasuhiro Kodera1, Hayao Nakanishi, Seiji Ito, Yoshitaka Yamamura, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Takashi Hirai, Kenzo Yasui, Tomoyuki Kato, Masae Tatematsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal lavage cytology is an excellent prognostic determinant but lacks sensitivity. Quantification of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA in peritoneal washes by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was found to be a more sensitive method to detect free cancer cells. It may be beneficial to explore, by the same method, a sample of the omentum, which is known to harbor cancer cells before the establishment of gross peritoneal metastasis.
METHODS: Greater omentum and peritoneal washes were obtained from 90 gastric carcinoma patients during laparotomy. The CEA mRNA levels in these materials were quantified using a real-time RT-PCR system with hybridization probes. The significance of CEA mRNA levels in both materials, as a predictive factor of peritoneal metastasis, was explored by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 718 days, 13 patients had clinical evidence of peritoneal metastasis. Under the assumption that these patients had free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity, the sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology for the detection of these cells were 31% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEA mRNA levels extracted from the peritoneal washing samples were 77% and 94%, while those of the omentum were 46% and 90%. Multivariate analysis, with the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis as an endpoint, revealed that CEA mRNA level in the peritoneal washes was the only significant risk factor.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative RT-PCR of peritoneal washes remains the first choice as a tool to sensitively predict intraperitoneal recurrence in gastric carcinoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111581     DOI: 10.1007/s101200200012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  12 in total

1.  Totally laparoscopic 95% gastrectomy for cancer: technical considerations.

Authors:  Luca Arru; Juan Santiago Azagra; Olivier Facy; Silviu Tiberiu Makkai-Popa; Virginie Poulain; Martine Goergen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Distribution of free cancer cells in the abdominal cavity suggests limitations of bursectomy as an essential component of radical surgery for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Yamamura; Seiji Ito; Yoshinari Mochizuki; Hayao Nakanishi; Masae Tatematsu; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Epstein-Barr virus association is rare in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideo Yanai; Atsuyoshi Hirano; Keisuke Matsusaki; Toyokazu Kawano; Osamu Miura; Tomoharu Yoshida; Kiwamu Okita; Norio Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

4.  Comparative study of complete and partial omentectomy in radical subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Min-Chan Kim; Ki-Han Kim; Ghap Joong Jung; David W Rattner
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Human Trial of a Genetically Modified Herpes Simplex Virus for Rapid Detection of Positive Peritoneal Cytology in the Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Kaitlyn J Kelly; Joyce Wong; Mithat Gönen; Peter Allen; Murray Brennan; Daniel Coit; Yuman Fong
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Prognostic Significance of Molecular Analysis of Peritoneal Fluid for Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kai Deng; Hong Zhu; Mo Chen; Junchao Wu; Renwei Hu; Chengwei Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Detection value of free cancer cells in peritoneal washing in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Andre Roncon Dias; Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; Ivan Cecconello; Bruno Zilberstein; Ulysses Ribeiro-Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Assessment of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Eradicate Intraperitoneal Free Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Zhonghe Ji; Jianhua Sun; Haitao Wu; Qian Zhang; Kaiwen Peng; Yan Li
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Prognostic value of genetic detection using CEA and MAGE in peritoneal washes with gastric carcinoma after curative resection: result of a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chang-Ho Jeon; In-Ho Kim; Hyun-Dong Chae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer following curative resection can be predicted by postoperative but not preoperative biomarkers: a single-institution study of 320 cases.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Chunmei Shi; Riping Wu; Zhiqing Huang; Qiang Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.