PURPOSE: S-1 is a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug that combines tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), which inhibits dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and potassium oxonate (Oxo). As 50% of CDHP is excreted in the urine, renal dysfunction may directly affect the DPD inhibitory effect and lead to increased 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concentrations. We sought to determine the influence of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 in an animal model and in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: An experimental renal failure model induced by cisplatin was developed in rabbits, and plasma concentrations of FT, 5-FU, CDHP and Oxo were determined after S-1 injection. Four patients with various degrees of renal impairment with unresectable gastric cancer were recruited to the study, and the pharmacokinetics in these four patients were analyzed following single and consecutive S-1 administrations. RESULTS: In experimental renal failure, plasma clearance of CDHP and 5-FU was retarded corresponding to the degree of renal impairment and there was a close correlation between creatinine clearance (CLcr) and plasma CDHP and 5-FU clearance. In the single administration study, half standard dose was used in three patients (CLcr > or = 50 ml/min) and one-third in the other (CLcr <50 ml/min). In patients with CLcr more than 75 ml/min, C(max), T(max), AUC((0-infinity)), and T(1/2) of 5-FU and CDHP were not different between single and consecutive administrations. In contrast, in patients with mild and moderate renal dysfunction (CLcr 55 and 36 ml/min, respectively), the T(1/2) values of CDHP with consecutive administrations (7.6 and 15.3 h, respectively) were longer than the values with single administration (4.6 and 8.2 h, respectively). The T(1/2) of 5-FU was 5.7 h with single administration and 8.5 h with consecutive administration in patients with moderate renal impairment. The AUC((0-infinity)) of 5-FU with consecutive administrations (3089.7 ng.h/ml) was far greater than with single administration (430.4 ng.h/ml). There was also a strong correlation between CLcr and plasma CDHP clearance. Based on the pharmacokinetics following multiple consecutive administrations, S-1 administration resulted in no severe adverse reactions in any of the four patients. CONCLUSIONS: CDHP clearance was prolonged in the presence of renal impairment, leading to a delayed T(1/2), and high AUC of 5-FU. These findings demonstrate that administration of S-1 to patients with impaired renal function may need individualized dosing and pharmacokinetic monitoring.
PURPOSE:S-1 is a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug that combines tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), which inhibits dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and potassium oxonate (Oxo). As 50% of CDHP is excreted in the urine, renal dysfunction may directly affect the DPD inhibitory effect and lead to increased 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concentrations. We sought to determine the influence of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 in an animal model and in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: An experimental renal failure model induced by cisplatin was developed in rabbits, and plasma concentrations of FT, 5-FU, CDHP and Oxo were determined after S-1 injection. Four patients with various degrees of renal impairment with unresectable gastric cancer were recruited to the study, and the pharmacokinetics in these four patients were analyzed following single and consecutive S-1 administrations. RESULTS: In experimental renal failure, plasma clearance of CDHP and 5-FU was retarded corresponding to the degree of renal impairment and there was a close correlation between creatinine clearance (CLcr) and plasma CDHP and 5-FU clearance. In the single administration study, half standard dose was used in three patients (CLcr > or = 50 ml/min) and one-third in the other (CLcr <50 ml/min). In patients with CLcr more than 75 ml/min, C(max), T(max), AUC((0-infinity)), and T(1/2) of 5-FU and CDHP were not different between single and consecutive administrations. In contrast, in patients with mild and moderate renal dysfunction (CLcr 55 and 36 ml/min, respectively), the T(1/2) values of CDHP with consecutive administrations (7.6 and 15.3 h, respectively) were longer than the values with single administration (4.6 and 8.2 h, respectively). The T(1/2) of 5-FU was 5.7 h with single administration and 8.5 h with consecutive administration in patients with moderate renal impairment. The AUC((0-infinity)) of 5-FU with consecutive administrations (3089.7 ng.h/ml) was far greater than with single administration (430.4 ng.h/ml). There was also a strong correlation between CLcr and plasma CDHP clearance. Based on the pharmacokinetics following multiple consecutive administrations, S-1 administration resulted in no severe adverse reactions in any of the four patients. CONCLUSIONS:CDHP clearance was prolonged in the presence of renal impairment, leading to a delayed T(1/2), and high AUC of 5-FU. These findings demonstrate that administration of S-1 to patients with impaired renal function may need individualized dosing and pharmacokinetic monitoring.