Literature DB >> 12109343

Prostate cancer trends in the era of prostate-specific antigen. An update of incidence, mortality, and clinical factors from the SEER database.

Robert A Stephenson1.   

Abstract

Concurrent with the successful life-saving efforts in terms of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, some men who do not need treatment are receiving it. These are men destined to die of causes other than prostate cancer. Unfortunately, at diagnosis, men needing treatment for prostate cancer cannot be differentiated from men who do not. To make such decisions correctly for individual patients would require extremely precise measures of the time to death from prostate cancer versus when the patient would die from a competing cause. Predictive tools with this level of accuracy will never be available given the inherent uncertainty of life. At the time of prostate cancer diagnosis, the date and the cause of death for the patient are matters of weak statistical speculation. Unless the date of death from prostate cancer and the date of death from non-prostate cancer causes can be precisely determined for each patient, some men will always be overtreated or undertreated. Conservative strategies result in the undertreatment of some patients who would benefit from treatment while sparing other patients unneeded treatment. Aggressive strategies result in the overtreatment of patients who do not need therapy while curing other men of prostate cancer. Both strategies are correct, but only some of the time. Better methods of determining the length of life and cause of death may improve this situation, but not by much. [figure: see text] Dramatic shifts in the incidence, grade, stage, and age of men with prostate cancer have been observed with the advent of widespread PSA-based cancer detection in the United States. Grade and stage trends suggest that more biologically relevant (the shift from well-differentiated to moderately differentiated tumors) and yet therapeutically amenable (earlier stage) tumors have been identified in large numbers of patients during the PSA era. Clearly many men have been diagnosed and treated who will not benefit from such treatment. The relative mix of these two groups of men is not known. Given the long delay between treatment and mortality that is inherent in prostate cancer (Fig. 14), the full effects of treatment on prostate cancer mortality are probably not yet seen in prostate cancer mortality data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12109343     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00002-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  19 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Race/ethnicity and the receipt of watchful waiting for the initial management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown; Arnold L Potosky; Carrie N Klabunde; W W Davis; Judd W Moul; Angela Fahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Association between smoking status, and free, total and percent free prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Jun Li; Trevor Thompson; Djenaba A Joseph; Viraj A Master
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Novel techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: evidence of efficacy?

Authors:  Marnie R Robinson; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment.

Authors:  Robert E Weiss; Vladimir Egorov; Suren Ayrapetyan; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Tyler R McClintock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

Review 7.  What implications do the tolerability profiles of antiandrogens and other commonly used prostate cancer treatments have on patient care?

Authors:  Malcolm Mason
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Managing bone loss and bone metastases in prostate cancer patients: a focus on bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  Ron S Israeli
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

9.  Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among men aged 75 years or older in the United States: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Jun Li; Guixiang Zhao; Lori A Pollack; Judith Lee Smith; Djenaba A Joseph
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Cell-free plasma DNA as biochemical biomarker for the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Marcelo L Wroclawski; Ary Serpa-Neto; Fernando L A Fonseca; Oseas Castro-Neves-Neto; Alexandre S F L Pompeo; Marcos T Machado; Antonio C L Pompeo; Auro del Giglio
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.