Literature DB >> 12108569

Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.

Robert D Miller1.   

Abstract

At least 17 jurisdictions permit insanity defenses to be entered over the objections of defendants. Those jurisdictions believe that society's interest in a just determination of the charges outweighs a competent defendant's choice. If competency includes the ability to rationally choose a plea, competent defendants should not be forced to enter insanity defenses against their wills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12108569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  1 in total

Review 1.  Frendak to phenis to breivik: an examination of the imposed insanity defense.

Authors:  William Donald Richie; Farzana Alam; Lalitha Gazula; Harold Embrack; Milankumar Nathani; Rahn Kennedy Bailey
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.