Literature DB >> 12108497

Outcome of women versus men with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Luis A Pires1, Barathi Sethuraman, Vamshidhar D Guduguntla, Katrina M Todd, Hiroshi Yamasaki, Srihari Ravi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Important sex differences in the incidence and outcome of patients with ischemic heart disease, the leading cause of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, have been identified. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has become the treatment of choice for patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), but little is known about gender differences in the outcome of ICD-treated patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this retrospective study, we compared arrhythmic events and survival of 376 women and 1,654 men treated with an ICD as part of prospective evaluations of transvenous devices or lead systems. Women were younger (62+/-14 years vs 65+/-12 years, P = 0.0005), had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (0.36+/-0.15 vs 0.32+/-0.13, P < 0.0001), were more likely to present with VF (34% vs 19%, P < 0.001), and had lower implantation defibrillation threshold (11+/-6 vs 13+/-6 J, P < 0.0001). Implant complication rates were similar in men and women (2.6% vs 3.5%, P = 0.46). The 1-year and 2-year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapies were 31.4% and 38.4% for men and 32.6% and 40.8% for women, respectively (P = 0.63). The unadjusted 1-year and 2-year cumulative survival rates were 95.6% and 93.7% for men and 95.7% and 94.3% for women, respectively (P = 0.98). Adjusted total (P = 0.61), sudden (P = 0.82), and cardiac (P = 0.34) death-free survivals also were similar in men and women.
CONCLUSION: Despite clinical differences suggesting women are at lower risk than men, men and women with VT/VF who are treated with an ICD have similar arrhythmic event and survival rates. These factors should be considered when determining risk and prescription of ICD therapy for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12108497     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00563.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  6 in total

1.  Gender and outcomes after primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR).

Authors:  Andrea M Russo; Stacie L Daugherty; Frederick A Masoudi; Yongfei Wang; Jeptha Curtis; Rachel Lampert
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Heart failure in women.

Authors:  Denise D Barnard
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Epidemiology of adult congenital heart disease: demographic variations worldwide.

Authors:  B J M Mulder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  Sex differences in the causes and natural history of heart failure.

Authors:  Bobbi L Hoppe; Denise D Hermann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in Canadian and US survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Christie Sambell; Helen Johansen; Kathryn Williams; Robert Lemery; Martin S Green; Michael H Gollob; Douglas S Lee; Anthony S L Tang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Age and sex differences in long-term outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in contemporary clinical practice: findings from the Cardiovascular Research Network.

Authors:  Frederick A Masoudi; Alan S Go; David J Magid; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Jerry H Gurwitz; Taylor I Liu; Kristi Reynolds; David H Smith; Liza M Reifler; Karen A Glenn; Frances Fiocchi; Robert Goldberg; Nigel Gupta; Pamela N Peterson; Claudio Schuger; Humberto Vidaillet; Stephen C Hammill; Robert T Greenlee
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.