Literature DB >> 12108493

Atrial fibrillation after DDDR pacemaker implantation.

Anne M Gillis1, Margaret Morck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Newer implantable pulse generators have data storage capabilities that permit detection of multiple episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the clinical predictors and time course of AF development in a general pacemaker population. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n = 231) received DDDR pacemakers with features that permit detection and storage of information about the date, time of onset, and duration of multiple, sequential episodes of AF. Patients were followed for 718+/-383 days. Time to first occurrence of AF, interval between first and second episode of AF, and total AF burden were determined at each follow-up visit. AF occurred more often in patients (68%) with sinus node disease than in patients with AV block (37%; P < 0.001). Time to first occurrence of AF was 21.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.7 to 30.6 days) after pacemaker implantation. AF burden initially decreased significantly in patients (0.8 hours/day, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9 at 8 weeks after implant vs 0.6 hours/day, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8 at 12 months after implant; P = 0.005) but then increased significantly during long-term follow-up (2.0 hours/day, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.7 at 48 months after implant; P = 0.008). The long-term increase in AF burden was seen predominantly in patients with sinus node disease. A prior history of AF and the duration of follow-up were independent predictors of AF occurrence.
CONCLUSION: AF develops frequently after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. AF burden increases progressively over the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12108493     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00542.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  16 in total

Review 1.  Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Polychronis E Dilaveris; Harold L Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation frequency and associated parameters in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mehmet Uğurlu; Onur Kaypakli; Durmuş Yıldıray Şahin; Yahya Kemal Içen; İbrahim Halil Kurt; Mevlüt Koç
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Home Screening for Detecting Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Renato Pietro Ricci; Taya V Glotzer
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 4.  Silent Atrial Fibrillation: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Alessandro Barbarossa; Federico Guerra; Alessandro Capucci
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-10-31

5.  Prevalence and predictors of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial pacing.

Authors:  Abdallah Bukari; Eisha Wali; Amrish Deshmukh; Zaid Aziz; Michael Broman; Andrew Beaser; Gaurav Upadhyay; Hemal Nayak; Roderick Tung; Cevher Ozcan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Programming Pacemakers to Reduce and Terminate Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Margarida Pujol-López; Rodolfo San Antonio; José María Tolosana; Lluís Mont
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Management of atrial high-rate episodes detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Authors:  Ben Freedman; Giuseppe Boriani; Taya V Glotzer; Jeff S Healey; Paulus Kirchhof; Tatjana S Potpara
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Impact of corrected sinus node recovery time in predicting recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Zhi-Song Chen; Hong-Wei Tan; Hao-Ming Song; Wen-Jun Xu; Xue-Bo Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Atrial Fibrillation Burden Detected by Dual-Chamber Pacemakers as a Predictor for Cardiac Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Song-Yun Chu; Jie Jiang; Yu-Ling Wang; Qin-Hui Sheng; Jing Zhou; Yan-Sheng Ding
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Design of the Pacemaker REmote Follow-up Evaluation and Review (PREFER) trial to assess the clinical value of the remote pacemaker interrogation in the management of pacemaker patients.

Authors:  Jane Chen; Bruce L Wilkoff; Wassim Choucair; Todd J Cohen; George H Crossley; W Ben Johnson; Luc R Mongeon; Gerald A Serwer; Lou Sherfesee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.