OBJECTIVES: This study planned to establish whether sympathetic hyperactivity exists in white-coat hypertension (WHT) in the clinical setting, relative to matched groups with normotension (NT) and untreated essential hypertension (EHT). BACKGROUND: White-coat hypertension differs from EHT by the presence of normal ambulatory blood pressure. Sympathetic hyperactivity exists in patients with EHT in the clinical setting and is believed to contribute to the development of target organ damage. Similar organ damage has been reported in WHT, yet little is known about sympathetic neural activity in this condition. METHODS: Using microneurography, we examined groups of 12 matched subjects with WHT, EHT and NT during the same clinical setting to quantify muscle sympathetic nerve activity as multiunit discharge (MSNA) and single units (s-MSNA). RESULTS: The s-MSNA in WHT (54 +/- 4.2 impulses/100 beats) was greater (p < 0.05) than in NT (37 +/- 5.4 impulses/100 beats) despite similar age and body mass index (BMI). The EHT values of s-MSNA (73 +/- 5.2 impulses/100 beats) were significantly (p < 0.05) greater than in WHT despite similar age, BMI and blood pressure levels. The MSNA followed a similar trend. White-coat hypertension had a similar cardiac baroreceptor reflex sensitivity to NT, but this was impaired in EHT relative to both NT and WHT. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown, in the clinical setting, that central sympathetic hyperactivity exists in WHT, albeit to a lesser degree than EHT. These findings suggest that WHT may not be entirely benign and that the observed sympathetic hyperactivity may be responsible for development of target organ damage in this group of patients.
OBJECTIVES: This study planned to establish whether sympathetic hyperactivity exists in white-coat hypertension (WHT) in the clinical setting, relative to matched groups with normotension (NT) and untreated essential hypertension (EHT). BACKGROUND: White-coat hypertension differs from EHT by the presence of normal ambulatory blood pressure. Sympathetic hyperactivity exists in patients with EHT in the clinical setting and is believed to contribute to the development of target organ damage. Similar organ damage has been reported in WHT, yet little is known about sympathetic neural activity in this condition. METHODS: Using microneurography, we examined groups of 12 matched subjects with WHT, EHT and NT during the same clinical setting to quantify muscle sympathetic nerve activity as multiunit discharge (MSNA) and single units (s-MSNA). RESULTS: The s-MSNA in WHT (54 +/- 4.2 impulses/100 beats) was greater (p < 0.05) than in NT (37 +/- 5.4 impulses/100 beats) despite similar age and body mass index (BMI). The EHT values of s-MSNA (73 +/- 5.2 impulses/100 beats) were significantly (p < 0.05) greater than in WHT despite similar age, BMI and blood pressure levels. The MSNA followed a similar trend. White-coat hypertension had a similar cardiac baroreceptor reflex sensitivity to NT, but this was impaired in EHT relative to both NT and WHT. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown, in the clinical setting, that central sympathetic hyperactivity exists in WHT, albeit to a lesser degree than EHT. These findings suggest that WHT may not be entirely benign and that the observed sympathetic hyperactivity may be responsible for development of target organ damage in this group of patients.
Authors: Erica A Wehrwein; Martin Novotny; Greg M Swain; Lindsay M Parker; Mohammad Esfahanian; John M Spitsbergen; Beth A Habecker; David L Kreulen Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Dan Wu; Lin Xu; Derek Abbott; William Kongto Hau; Lijie Ren; Heye Zhang; Kelvin K L Wong Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Mark R de Jong; Annemiek F Hoogerwaard; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jaap Jan J Smit; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Jan-Evert Heeg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Harry J G M Crijns; Ignacio Fernández Lozano; Jorge E Toquero Ramos; F Javier Alzueta; Borja Ibañez; José M Rubio; Fernando Arribas; José M Porres Aracama; Josep Brugada; Lluís Mont; Arif Elvan Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Elizabeth B Oliveira-Sales; Eduardo Colombari; Ana Paula Abdala; Ruy R Campos; Julian F R Paton Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 2.969