Literature DB >> 12101114

Reliability in the classification of advanced colorectal adenomas.

Mary Beth Terry1, Alfred I Neugut, Roberd M Bostick, John D Potter, Robert W Haile, Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser.   

Abstract

In conjunction with a pooled analysis of risk factors for advanced adenomas [adenomas with severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ (CIS), and intramucosal carcinoma], we undertook a reliability study on the pathological diagnosis of advanced adenomas. We assessed intraobserver agreement (using Kappa (kappa) as the measure of agreement) across two time periods 10 years apart with a single pathologist and interobserver agreement (using Kappa) between two pathologists rating the same slides concurrently. The study pathologists were blinded to the original case classification. We used the slides of 190 colorectal adenomatous polyp cases (104 originally diagnosed as advanced adenomas, 86 adenomas without advanced lesions) from a colonoscopy-based case-control study conducted in New York City between 1986 and 1988. We also assessed conditional agreement for 71 slides of advanced adenomas from four adenoma case-control studies conducted in different geographic regions of the United States in the 1990s. Intra- and interobserver agreement was only fair to moderate on the classification of both histological type (villous, tubulovillous, and tubular: intraobserver kappa = 0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.39; interobserver kappa = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.62) and degree of dysplasia (none/mild, moderate, severe, CIS, and intramucosal: intraobserver kappa = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.12-0.28; interobserver kappa = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.55). Using broader, rather than finer, classifications for degree of dysplasia substantially improved the reliability (interobserver agreement for high-grade dysplasia (including severe dysplasia, CIS, and intramucosal carcinoma) versus low-grade dysplasia: kappa = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.83). These findings suggest that future epidemiological studies of advanced adenomas should use broad categories, such as high-grade versus low-grade dysplasia, include central review of all slides, and take measurement error into account in sample size calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12101114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  13 in total

1.  Awareness of postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: a nationwide survey of colonoscopists in Canada.

Authors:  Harmke van Kooten; Vincent de Jonge; Eline Schreuders; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; Patricia Thompson; Karen Messer; Erin L Ashbeck; David A Lieberman; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Douglas J Robertson; Elizabeth T Jacobs; E Robert Greenberg; Amanda J Cross; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of ovarian cancers: estimation of microsatellite-high frequency and characterization of mismatch repair deficient tumor histology.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Jenny Permuth-Wey; Ambuj Kumar; Thomas A Sellers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Family history of colorectal cancer: a determinant of advanced adenoma stage or adenoma multiplicity?

Authors:  Petra A Wark; Kana Wu; Pieter van 't Veer; Charles F Fuchs; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Colonoscopic yield of colorectal neoplasia in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Mike E Craanen; Rene W M van der Hulst; Joep F Bartelsman; Dick P Bezemer; Kim R Cappendijk; Gerrit A Meijer; Linde M Morsink; Pleun Snel; Hans A R E Tuynman; Roy L J van Wanrooy; Eric I C Wesdorp; Chris J J Mulder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Metachronous cancer development in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas-multivariate risk model with independent and combined value of hTERT and survivin.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Emiel A M Janssen; Bianca Van Diermen; Hartwig Körner; Jan P A Baak
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  e-Learning for Instruction and to Improve Reproducibility of Scoring Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colon Carcinoma: Performance and Reproducibility Assessment in the UNITED Study.

Authors:  Marloes A Smit; Gabi W van Pelt; Elisabeth Mc Dequeker; Raed Al Dieri; Rob Aem Tollenaar; J Han Jm van Krieken; Wilma E Mesker
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-03-19

8.  A new practical classification of desmoplastic reaction in endoscopic forceps biopsy of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Haiyan Jing; Liang Shang; Shulei Zhao; Zhigang Yao; Beibei Lv; Xiaolong Zhu
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Tobacco, alcohol, and p53 overexpression in early colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Alfred I Neugut; Mahesh Mansukhani; Jerome Waye; Noam Harpaz; Hanina Hibshoosh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps: Where are we at in 2016?

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu; Doreen Koay; Alastair Burt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.