Literature DB >> 12100845

Differential conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation responses in humans.

Günter Reinhard1, Harald Lachnit.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiments was to demonstrate conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation responses in humans as previous efforts to condition pupillary dilation had yielded inconsistent results. In those studies, using an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) had yielded more promising results than using non-aversive USs. In three experiments we utilized a reaction time task as a non-aversive US and observed reliable differential conditioning of anticipatory pupillary dilation. Differential responding was evident within very few trials and was largest late in the anticipatory interval. Experiment 4 replicated these findings using an aversive US (electric shock). In measuring anticipatory responses in a differential conditioning preparation all four experiments provided clear evidence for Pavlovian conditioning of pupillary dilation in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12100845     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(02)00011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  8 in total

1.  Persistence of Amygdala-Hippocampal Connectivity and Multi-Voxel Correlation Structures During Awake Rest After Fear Learning Predicts Long-Term Expression of Fear.

Authors:  Erno J Hermans; Jonathan W Kanen; Arielle Tambini; Guillén Fernández; Lila Davachi; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  How to detect amygdala activity with magnetoencephalography using source imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Douglas H Schultz; Sylvain Baillet; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Attentional Bias for Uncertain Cues of Shock in Human Fear Conditioning: Evidence for Attentional Learning Theory.

Authors:  Stephan Koenig; Metin Uengoer; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Relief from incidental fear evokes exuberant risk taking.

Authors:  Sonja van Well; John P O'Doherty; Frans van Winden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Early Auditory Event Related Potentials Distinguish Higher-Order From First-Order Aversive Conditioning.

Authors:  Prateek Dhamija; Allison Wong; Asaf Gilboa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  No evidence of conditioning of pupillary constriction despite overtraining.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Stina Bengtsson; Niklas Brodin; Anders Rasmussen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Eye Movements Index Implicit Memory Expression in Fear Conditioning.

Authors:  Lauren S Hopkins; Douglas H Schultz; Deborah E Hannula; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A pupil size response model to assess fear learning.

Authors:  Christoph W Korn; Matthias Staib; Athina Tzovara; Giuseppe Castegnetti; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.016

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.