Literature DB >> 12100342

Detention of the mentally ill in Europe--a review.

Martin Zinkler1, Stefan Priebe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of compulsory admission varies widely across Europe. Although there has been some research on a nation-wide level, no work has been done to compare mental health legislation in different countries in relation to detention rates and to patients' perception of hospital detention.
METHOD: Databases and government statistics were searched for regional, national and European data. Legal frameworks were compared and reviewed in relation to patients' and professionals' views.
RESULTS: Nearly 20-fold variations in detention rates were found in different parts of Europe. Criteria for detention of the mentally ill are broadly similar when it comes to patients at risk to themselves or others. However different rules apply for involuntary treatment in the interest of the patient's health.
CONCLUSION: Variations in detention rates across Europe appear to be influenced by professionals' ethics and attitudes, sociodemographic variables, the public's preoccupation about risk arising from mental illness and the respective legal framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12100342     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02268.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  36 in total

1.  Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care.

Authors:  Stefan Priebe; Trevor Turner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-25

2.  Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States.

Authors:  Harald Dressing; Hans Joachim Salize
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data.

Authors:  Thomas W Kallert; Matthias Glöckner; Georgi Onchev; Jirí Raboch; Anastasia Karastergiou; Zahava Solomon; Lorenza Magliano; Algirdas Dembinskas; Andrzej Kiejna; Petr Nawka; Francisco Torres-González; Stefan Priebe; Lars Kjellin
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Professionals' attitudes toward reducing restraint: the case of seclusion in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marjan van Doeselaar; Peter Sleegers; Giel Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2008-01-03

5.  Differences in the use of involuntary admission across the Veneto Region: which role for individual and contextual variables?

Authors:  V Donisi; F Tedeschi; D Salazzari; F Amaddeo
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.892

6.  Community psychiatry's achievements.

Authors:  T Burns
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.892

7.  Compulsory admission and treatment in schizophrenia: a study of ethical attitudes in four European countries.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Peter Lepping; Réka Baranyai; Markus Hoffmann; Herbert Leherr
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 8.  Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.

Authors:  S P Sashidharan; Roberto Mezzina; Dainius Puras
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 6.892

9.  Risk of readmission in compulsorily and voluntarily admitted patients.

Authors:  Avi Valevski; Mark Olfson; Abraham Weizman; Roni Shiloh
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Does mental health service integration affect compulsory admissions?

Authors:  André I Wierdsma; Cornelis L Mulder
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.120

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.