BACKGROUND: There is a large variability in clinical response to corticosteroid treatment in patients with asthma. Several markers of inflammation like eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), as well as exhaled nitric oxide (NO), are good candidates to predict clinical response. AIM: We wanted to determine whether we could actually predict a favourable response to inhaled corticosteroids in individual patients. METHODS:One hundred and twenty patients with unstable asthma were treated with either prednisolone 30 mg/day, fluticasone propionate 1000 microg/day b.i.d. or fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day b.i.d., both via Diskhaler. They were treated during 2 weeks, in a double-blind, parallel group, double dummy design. We measured eosinophils and ECP in blood and sputum, and exhaled nitric oxide as inflammatory parameters before and after 2 weeks in order to predict the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 Mch), and asthma quality of life (QOL). Secondly, to test whether these results were applicable in clinical practice we determined the individual prediction of corticosteroid response. RESULTS: We found that changes in FEV1, PC20 Mch and QOL with corticosteroids were predominantly predicted by their respective baseline value and to a smaller extent by eosinophils in blood or sputum. ECP, measured in blood or sputum, was certainly not better than eosinophils in predicting clinical response to corticosteroids. Smoking status was an additional predictor for change in FEV1, but not for change in PC20 Mch or QOL. Prediction of a good clinical response was poor. For instance, high sputum eosinophils (> or = 3%) correctly predicted an improvement in PC20 Mch in only 65% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that baseline values of the clinical parameters used as outcome parameters are the major predictors of clinical response to corticosteroids. Eosinophil percentage in blood or sputum adds to this, whereas ECP provides no additional information. Correct prediction of clinical response in an individual patient, however, remains poor with our currently used clinical and inflammatory parameters.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is a large variability in clinical response to corticosteroid treatment in patients with asthma. Several markers of inflammation like eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), as well as exhaled nitric oxide (NO), are good candidates to predict clinical response. AIM: We wanted to determine whether we could actually predict a favourable response to inhaled corticosteroids in individual patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with unstable asthma were treated with either prednisolone 30 mg/day, fluticasone propionate 1000 microg/day b.i.d. or fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day b.i.d., both via Diskhaler. They were treated during 2 weeks, in a double-blind, parallel group, double dummy design. We measured eosinophils and ECP in blood and sputum, and exhaled nitric oxide as inflammatory parameters before and after 2 weeks in order to predict the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 Mch), and asthma quality of life (QOL). Secondly, to test whether these results were applicable in clinical practice we determined the individual prediction of corticosteroid response. RESULTS: We found that changes in FEV1, PC20 Mch and QOL with corticosteroids were predominantly predicted by their respective baseline value and to a smaller extent by eosinophils in blood or sputum. ECP, measured in blood or sputum, was certainly not better than eosinophils in predicting clinical response to corticosteroids. Smoking status was an additional predictor for change in FEV1, but not for change in PC20 Mch or QOL. Prediction of a good clinical response was poor. For instance, high sputum eosinophils (> or = 3%) correctly predicted an improvement in PC20 Mch in only 65% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that baseline values of the clinical parameters used as outcome parameters are the major predictors of clinical response to corticosteroids. Eosinophil percentage in blood or sputum adds to this, whereas ECP provides no additional information. Correct prediction of clinical response in an individual patient, however, remains poor with our currently used clinical and inflammatory parameters.
Authors: Raed A Dweik; Peter B Boggs; Serpil C Erzurum; Charles G Irvin; Margaret W Leigh; Jon O Lundberg; Anna-Carin Olin; Alan L Plummer; D Robin Taylor Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Njira Lugogo; Cynthia L Green; Noah Agada; Siyi Zhang; Susanne Meghdadpour; Run Zhou; Siyun Yang; Kevin J Anstrom; Elliot Israel; Richard Martin; Robert F Lemanske; Homer Boushey; Stephen C Lazarus; Stephen I Wasserman; Mario Castro; William Calhoun; Stephen P Peters; Emily DiMango; Vernon Chinchilli; Susan Kunselman; Tonya S King; Nikolina Icitovic; Monica Kraft Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Zhenying Nie; Jessica N Maung; David B Jacoby; Allison D Fryer Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Mike Berry; Angela Morgan; Dominick E Shaw; Deborah Parker; Ruth Green; Christopher Brightling; Peter Bradding; Andrew J Wardlaw; Ian D Pavord Journal: Thorax Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Jason E Knuffman; Christine A Sorkness; Robert F Lemanske; David T Mauger; Susan J Boehmer; Fernando D Martinez; Leonard B Bacharier; Robert C Strunk; Stanley J Szefler; Robert S Zeiger; Lynn M Taussig Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2009-01-03 Impact factor: 10.793