Literature DB >> 12098722

Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region.

Diana Wellesley1, Tracy Boyle, John Barber, David T Howe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of different screening policies for the antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.
DESIGN: Retrospective six year survey.
SETTING: Maternity units of eight districts. PARTICIPANTS: Women who completed their pregnancies between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1999 (155 501 deliveries). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cases of Down's syndrome identified before 24 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: 335 cases of Down's syndrome were identified, 323 in continuing pregnancies or liveborn children. Of these, 171 were identified antenatally. Seven different screening policies were used, in three principal groups: serum screening offered to all mothers, maternal age with serum screening or nuchal translucency available to limited groups, and maternal age combined with anomaly scans. The districts that used serum screening detected 57%, those using maternal age plus serum or nuchal translucency screening 52%, and those using a maternal age of > or =35 and anomaly scans detected 54%. The least successful district, which offered amniocentesis only to women aged over 37 years, detected only 31%. If amniocentesis had been offered from 35 years, as in all other districts, the detection rate would have risen to 54%. Across the region 15% (range 12-20%) of pregnant women were 35 years or more at delivery, and 58% (33-69%) of infants with Down's syndrome were born to women in this age range.
CONCLUSIONS: Current additional serum or nuchal translucency screening techniques for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome are less advantageous than previously supposed. More pregnant women were aged over 35 than has been presumed in statistical models used in demonstration projects of serum screening and, as a result, the proportion of affected fetuses in this age group is much greater than predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098722      PMCID: PMC116665          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7354.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  6 in total

1.  Results of first year (1989) of a national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales.

Authors:  D E Mutton; E Alberman; R Ide; M Bobrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-23

2.  A prospective evaluation of a second-trimester screening test for fetal Down syndrome using maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol.

Authors:  E Y Cheng; D A Luthy; A M Zebelman; M A Williams; R E Lieppman; D E Hickok
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  N J Wald; A Kennard; A Hackshaw; A McGuire
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Six year survey of screening for Down's syndrome by maternal age and mid-trimester ultrasound scans.

Authors:  D T Howe; R Gornall; D Wellesley; T Boyle; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

5.  Down's syndrome. Recent trends in the United States.

Authors:  M M Adams; J D Erickson; P M Layde; G P Oakley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Second-trimester maternal serum screening using alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotrophin, and unconjugated oestriol: experience of a regional programme.

Authors:  S F Goodburn; J R Yates; P R Raggatt; C Carr; M E Ferguson-Smith; A J Kershaw; P J Milton; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.050

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome. Audit of Down's syndrome screening is not valid.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wald; Wayne Huttly; Allan K Hackshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

2.  A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; François Goffinet
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Ghada M Elsayed; Lobna El Assiouty; Ezzat S El Sobky
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.