Literature DB >> 12098633

Reproducibility of pain measurement and pain perception.

Elisa M Rosier1, Michael J Iadarola, Robert C Coghill.   

Abstract

The reproducibility of both the conscious experience of pain and the reproducibility of psychophysical assessments of pain remain critical, yet poorly characterized factors in pain research and treatment. To assess the reproducibility of both the pain experience and two methods of pain assessment, 15 subjects evaluated experimental heat pain during four weekly sessions. In each session, both brief (5s) and prolonged (90s) heat stimuli were utilized to determine effects of stimulus duration on reproducibility. Multiple presentations of the brief heat stimuli in each session were used to evaluate effects of response averaging. Both visual analog scales (VAS) and randomized verbal descriptor scales (VDS) were employed to better distinguish variations in the pain experience from variations in pain scale usage. Subjects also rated the intensity of visual stimuli in order to provide an independent assessment of the session-to-session variation in the use of both types of scales. Within-subjects analyses revealed that ratings of visual stimuli exhibited significantly less session-to-session variation than ratings of heat pain. Thus, pain perceptions were more variable than perceptions of visual stimuli after controlling for session-to-session variations in scale usage. Comparisons between scales indicated that intensity ratings acquired with the VAS had significantly smaller session-to-session variation than those acquired with the VDS, although VDS ratings were spread across a larger range of the scale. For both scales, analyses of the effects of stimulus averaging and stimulus duration revealed that averaging multiple assessments of the same stimulus substantially reduces session-to-session variation and that multiple assessments of brief stimuli produce responses which are more reproducible than a single presentation of a prolonged stimulus. However, the VAS was significantly more sensitive to small differences in perceived pain intensity and pain unpleasantness, and did not exhibit some of the order effects present with the VDS. Taken together, these results indicate that the reproducibility of psychophysical ratings of pain can be maximized: (1) by averaging responses to multiple, brief stimuli; (2) by providing subjects with a training period distinct from the study period; and (3) by ensuring that interpretation of scale parameters remains constant over time. Thus, although the experiences of both experimental and clinical pain are highly variable, pain assessment procedures can be structured to minimize session-to-session variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098633     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00048-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  45 in total

1.  Neural correlates of interindividual differences in the subjective experience of pain.

Authors:  Robert C Coghill; John G McHaffie; Yi-Fen Yen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Statin-associated muscle-related adverse effects: a case series of 354 patients.

Authors:  Stephanie Cham; Marcella A Evans; Julie O Denenberg; Beatrice A Golomb
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Prostate cancer pain management: EAU guidelines on pain management.

Authors:  Pia Bader; Dieter Echtle; Valerie Fonteyne; Kostas Livadas; Gert De Meerleer; Alvaro Paez Borda; Eleni G Papaioannou; Jan H Vranken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Analysis of nighttime activity and daytime pain in patients with chronic back pain using a self-organizing map neural network.

Authors:  John J Liszka-Hackzell; David P Martin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Stability of tactile- and pain-related fMRI brain activations: an examination of threshold-dependent and threshold-independent methods.

Authors:  Keri S Taylor; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity.

Authors:  Philipp Taesler; Michael Rose
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Filling-in, spatial summation, and radiation of pain: evidence for a neural population code in the nociceptive system.

Authors:  Alexandre S Quevedo; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Training and Hypnotic Suggestion for Acute Pain Relief in the Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Eric L Garland; Anne K Baker; Paula Larsen; Michael R Riquino; Sarah E Priddy; Elizabeth Thomas; Adam W Hanley; Patricia Galbraith; Nathan Wanner; Yoshio Nakamura
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Pain intensity assessment by bedside nurses and palliative care consultants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eduardo Bruera; Jie S Willey; Patricia A Ewert-Flannagan; Mary K Cline; Guddi Kaur; Loren Shen; Tao Zhang; J Lynn Palmer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Reliability of the nociceptive flexor reflex (RIII) threshold and association with Pain threshold.

Authors:  Peter S Micalos; Eric J Drinkwater; Jack Cannon; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Frank E Marino
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.