Stephen R Lord1, Hylton B Menz. 1. Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick NSW, Australia. s.lord@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which physiologic, psychologic, and health-related factors predict 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in older people. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Retirement villages. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 515 people between the ages of 62 and 95 years (mean +/- standard deviation, 79.5+/-6.4y) residing in retirement villages in Australia. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative tests of vision, strength, peripheral sensation, reaction time, and balance and short Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and 6MWD. RESULTS: All physiologic, psychologic, and health scores were significantly associated with 6MWD. Multiple regression analysis revealed that 10 factors (visual contrast sensitivity, lower-limb strength, simple reaction time, postural sway, maximal balance range, PANAS positive scale score, SF-36 pain score, number of medications used, SF-36 general health subscale score, age) were significant and independent predictors of 6MWD performance. Of these measures, strength, maximal balance range, medication use, and age explained the largest proportions of the variance in 6MWD. The final regression model explained over half (52.5%) of the variance in 6MWD (multiple r=.72). CONCLUSIONS: In older people, 6MWD depends on multiple physiologic, psychologic, and health factors. Thus, 6MWD appears to provide a measure of overall mobility and physical functioning in this population group rather than a specific measure of cardiovascular fitness. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which physiologic, psychologic, and health-related factors predict 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in older people. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Retirement villages. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 515 people between the ages of 62 and 95 years (mean +/- standard deviation, 79.5+/-6.4y) residing in retirement villages in Australia. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative tests of vision, strength, peripheral sensation, reaction time, and balance and short Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and 6MWD. RESULTS: All physiologic, psychologic, and health scores were significantly associated with 6MWD. Multiple regression analysis revealed that 10 factors (visual contrast sensitivity, lower-limb strength, simple reaction time, postural sway, maximal balance range, PANAS positive scale score, SF-36 pain score, number of medications used, SF-36 general health subscale score, age) were significant and independent predictors of 6MWD performance. Of these measures, strength, maximal balance range, medication use, and age explained the largest proportions of the variance in 6MWD. The final regression model explained over half (52.5%) of the variance in 6MWD (multiple r=.72). CONCLUSIONS: In older people, 6MWD depends on multiple physiologic, psychologic, and health factors. Thus, 6MWD appears to provide a measure of overall mobility and physical functioning in this population group rather than a specific measure of cardiovascular fitness. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors: Flávia A C Wanderley; Gustavo Silva; Elisa Marques; José Oliveira; Jorge Mota; Joana Carvalho Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-03-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: J Matt McCrary; David Goldstein; David Wyld; Robert Henderson; Craig R Lewis; Susanna B Park Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Marinda Henskens; Ilse M Nauta; Marieke C A van Eekeren; Erik J A Scherder Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Magdalena I Tolea; Paul T Costa; Antonio Terracciano; Michael Griswold; Eleanor M Simonsick; Samer S Najjar; Angelo Scuteri; Barbara Deiana; Marco Orrù; Marco Masala; Manuela Uda; David Schlessinger; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Neil A Segal; Elizabeth R Boyer; Robert Wallace; James C Torner; H John Yack Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Mary L Greaney; Deborah Riebe; Claudio R Nigg; Patricia A Burbank; Phillip G Clark Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.921