Literature DB >> 12098088

First and second generation recombinant factor VIII concentrates in previously untreated patients: recovery, safety, efficacy, and inhibitor development.

Jeanne M Lusher1.   

Abstract

The first of the prospective multicenter studies in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate began in January 1989. Over the past 11 years, PUP studies have amassed a great deal of information concerning safety, efficacy, and inhibitor development of the two "first-generation" recombinant (r) FVIII concentrates (Kogenate and Recombinate) and of two "second-generation" products (ReFacto and Kogenate FS, which is formulated with sucrose rather than with albumin). Each of these products has proved to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated. Side effects have been rare and mild in nature. There have been no clinical reactions to hamster or murine proteins. During the course of the multinational PUP trials with Kogenate, Recombinate, and ReFacto, inhibitors developed in 29.7, 31, and 33%, respectively, of severely affected PUPs. Half of these were high titer and half were low titer. In each of these trials, several inhibitors were transient. PUPs and minimally treated patients (MTPs) in the Kogenate SF trial have not been followed long enough to determine the incidence of inhibitor development; however, the product appears to be safe and effective. Following demonstration of safety and efficacy with each rFVIII concentrate in previously treated patients with hemophilia A, studies in PUPs began. In general, the prospective trials in PUPs with each recombinant product were conducted similarly, allowing comparison of data. This article is intended to provide a review of the experience with both first- and second-generation rFVIII products in the prospective clinical trials in PUPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098088     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 0094-6176            Impact factor:   4.180


  8 in total

1.  Product-dependent anti-factor VIII antibodies.

Authors:  S Butenas; J Krudysz-Amblo; G E Rivard; K G Mann
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  Recurrent intramural hematoma of the small intestine in a severe hemophilia A patient with a high titer of factor VIII inhibitor: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Akira Katsumi; Tadashi Matsushita; Kanji Hirashima; Toshihiro Iwasaki; Tatsuya Adachi; Koji Yamamoto; Tetsuhito Kojima; Junki Takamatsu; Hidehiko Saito; Tomoki Naoe
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Potency and mass of factor VIII in FVIII products.

Authors:  S Butenas; B Parhami-Seren; M T Gissel; E D Gomperts; D N Fass; K G Mann
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.287

4.  Lipid nanotechnologies for structural studies of membrane-associated proteins.

Authors:  Svetla Stoilova-McPhie; Kirill Grushin; Daniela Dalm; Jaimy Miller
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-07-03

Review 5.  Recombinant activated clotting factor VII (rFVIIa) in the treatment of surgical and spontaneous bleeding episodes in hemophilic patients.

Authors:  Heng Joo Ng; Lai Heng Lee
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

6.  Lack of recombinant factor VIII B-domain induces phospholipid vesicle aggregation: implications for the immunogenicity of factor VIII.

Authors:  K Grushin; J Miller; D Dalm; E T Parker; J F Healey; P Lollar; S Stoilova-McPhie
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 7.  Different impact of factor VIII products on inhibitor development?

Authors:  H Marijke van den Berg
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2016-10-04

8.  Blood Clotting Factor VIII: From Evolution to Therapy.

Authors:  N A Orlova; S V Kovnir; I I Vorobiev; A G Gabibov; A I Vorobiev
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.845

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.