Literature DB >> 12098042

Anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma in 100 patients: significant differences between young and elderly.

Kouji Tsugawa1, Nobuhiro Koyanagi, Makoto Hashizume, Katsuhiko Ayukawa, Hiroya Wada, Morimasa Tomikawa, Toshihiko Ueyama, Keizo Sugimachi.   

Abstract

The liver is the organ most commonly injured during blunt abdominal trauma. As our society ages, emergency surgery for active elderly patients increases, but data on aggressive emergency hepatic resection remain scarce in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elderly (70 years of age or older) can tolerate major liver injury and subsequent hepatic resection. We investigated 100 patients who were treated by an anatomic resection for severe blunt liver trauma (29 elderly patients who were 70 years of age or older and 71 young patients who were younger than 70 years of age) in a retrospective study. The elderly patients were more severely injured as demonstrated by a higher Injury Severity Score, a lower Glascow Coma Scale, and lower survival (80.3% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.05). The total number of associated injuries was greater in elderly patients. Motor vehicle accidents were responsible for 71.8% of the injuries in the young group, and the predominant mechanism in the elderly patients was also motor vehicle accidents (51.7%). The 71 anatomic hepatic resections performed on the young patients included right hemihepatectomy (n = 45), left lateral segment resection (n = 14), bisegmentectomy (n = 5), and others. The 29 anatomic hepatic resections performed for the elderly patients were right hemihepatectomy (n = 15), left lateral segment resection (n = 5), left hemihepatectomy (n = 4), and others. Pneumonia, subphrenic abscess, and urosepsis occurred at a significantly higher frequency in elderly patients than in young patients. Our data clearly indicated that (1) the mechanism of injury, grade of associated intraabdominal injuries, distribution of surgical procedures, and complications differ significantly between young and elderly patients; and (2) the survival rate (65.5%) in elderly patients may be sufficient to consider anatomic hepatic resection to be a useful, safe procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098042     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0264-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  Injuries of the liver.

Authors:  G F MADDING
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1955-05

2.  Laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M Hashizume; K Takenaka; K Yanaga; M Ohta; K Kajiyama; K Shirabe; H Itasaka; T Nishizaki; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Management of liver trauma in 811 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D D Trunkey; G T Shires; R Mc Clelland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution in rats with hemorrhagic shock induces immediate apoptosis.

Authors:  S Deb; B Martin; L Sun; P Ruff; D Burris; N Rich; S DeBreux; B Austin; P Rhee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-04

5.  Founder's lecture: The mythology of hepatic trauma--or Babel revisited.

Authors:  A J Walt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney.

Authors:  E E Moore; S R Shackford; H L Pachter; J W McAninch; B D Browner; H R Champion; L M Flint; T A Gennarelli; M A Malangoni; M L Ramenofsky
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1989-12

7.  Anatomic resection for severe liver trauma.

Authors:  R W Strong; S V Lynch; D R Wall; C L Liu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Packing for control of hepatic hemorrhage.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; K L Mattox; J M Burch; C G Bitondo; G L Jordan
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1986-08

9.  Liver packing for uncontrolled hemorrhage: a reappraisal.

Authors:  R R Ivatury; M Nallathambi; Y Gunduz; R Constable; M Rohman; W M Stahl
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1986-08

Review 10.  Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma is the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Results of a prospective trial.

Authors:  M A Croce; T C Fabian; P G Menke; L Waddle-Smith; G Minard; K A Kudsk; J H Patton; M J Schurr; F E Pritchard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

1.  Anatomic resection for severe liver trauma.

Authors:  Julian E Losanoff; Bruce W Richman; James W Jones
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Experience with managing liver trauma in southeastern Nigeria.

Authors:  Gu Chianakwana; Ku Umeh; Jo Chianakwana
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04

3.  [Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma].

Authors:  R Ott; M R Schön; S Seidel; E Schuster; C Josten; J Hauss
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Efficacy and safety of non-operative management of blunt liver trauma.

Authors:  C Morales; L Barrera; M Moreno; M Villegas; J Correa; L Sucerquia; W Sanchez
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Management of liver trauma in Kuwait.

Authors:  Sami Asfar; Mousa Khoursheed; Mervat Al-Saleh; Abdullah A Alfawaz; Medhat M Farghaly; Ali M Nur
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Complex hepatic injury involving a liver transplant recipient: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Sanjiv Gray; Fariha Shiekh; Joseph Shiber
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-14

7.  Hepatectomy as a Salvage procedure for blunt abdominal trauma: A case report.

Authors:  Eduardo C Ayuste; Siegfredo R Paloyo; Allan Dante M Concejero; Joel U Macalino; Orlando O Ocampo
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.