Literature DB >> 12097507

Stimulation-induced within-representation and across-representation plasticity in human motor cortex.

Ulf Ziemann1, George F Wittenberg, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

The human motor cortex contains a dynamic and distributed network of motor representations. Formation, maintenance, and modification of these representations is an activity-driven process. Repeated stimulation of one representation results in increased motor output from this representation, a process referred to as "within-representation plasticity." We showed previously that within-representation plasticity of the upper arm representation occurs when repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is delivered to that representation during transient ischemic nerve block (INB) of the contralateral hand. INB reduces inhibition in the motor cortex and thus lowers the threshold for stimulation-induced plasticity. Here we studied the effects of rTMS delivered to nearby body part representations on the motor output from the upper arm representation. Six healthy subjects underwent INB-alone (control), or INB plus 30 min of focal 0.1 Hz rTMS of either the face, hand, arm, leg, or overlap arm/hand representations in motor cortex. INB-alone and rTMS of the leg representation resulted in only a short-lasting (< 20 min) increase in motor output from the arm representation, as measured by motor evoked potentials in the biceps. rTMS of arm and arm/hand representations induced a prolonged (> 60 min) within-representation increase. In contrast, rTMS of face or hand representations canceled the short-lasting increase and even led to a long-lasting decrease of motor output from the arm representation. Therefore, rTMS of the experimentally disinhibited motor cortex induces within-representation increase, and across-representation decrease of motor cortical output. This bidirectional plasticity might be used for purposeful modulation of human cortical function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12097507      PMCID: PMC6758194          DOI: 20026584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  14 in total

1.  Integrated versus isolated training of the hemiparetic upper extremity in haptically rendered virtual environments.

Authors:  Qinyin Qiu; Gerard G Fluet; Soha Saleh; Ian Lafond; Alma S Merians; Sergei V Adamovich
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

Review 2.  The Olympic brain. Does corticospinal plasticity play a role in acquisition of skills required for high-performance sports?

Authors:  Jens Bo Nielsen; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Modifying somatosensory processing with non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Pilot fMRI investigation of representational plasticity associated with motor skill learning and its functional consequences.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; James R Carey
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Stimulation-induced changes in lower limb corticomotor excitability during treadmill walking in humans.

Authors:  James W Stinear; T George Hornby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Andre Machado
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.

Authors:  Alzahraa Amer; Jianxun Xia; Michael Smith; John H Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 8.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

9.  Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain.

Authors:  J-P Lefaucheur; X Drouot; I Menard-Lefaucheur; F Zerah; B Bendib; P Cesaro; Y Keravel; J-P Nguyen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation attenuates somatosensory evoked potentials from the lower limb.

Authors:  Christopher M Zapallow; Michael J Asmussen; David A E Bolton; Kevin G H Lee; Mark F Jacobs; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.