Literature DB >> 12096937

Open versus endovascular AAA repair in patients who are morphological candidates for endovascular treatment.

Bradley B Hill1, Yehuda G Wolf, W Anthony Lee, Frank R Arko, Cornelius Olcott, Peter J Schubart, Ronald L Dalman, E John Harris, Thomas J Fogarty, Christopher K Zarins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a cohort of patients who fulfill morphological criteria for endovascular repair.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 229 consecutive AAA patients treated over a 3-year period identified 149 patients who were candidates for endovascular repair based on preoperative computed tomography and angiography. Of the 149 patients, 79 (68 men; mean age 74 +/- 8 years) underwent endovascular repair with the AneuRx stent-graft; the remaining 70 (56 men; mean age 72 +/- 8 years) had open repair. Short-term outcome measures were 30-day mortality and procedure-related morbidity, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, intraoperative blood loss, interval to oral diet, and time to ambulation. Long-term outcome measures included death and secondary procedures.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between endovascular repair (2, 2.5%) and open repair (2, 2.9%), even though endovascular patients had more comorbidities (p<0.05). Overall length of stay was reduced for endovascular patients (3.9 +/- 2.4 days versus 7.7 +/- 3.1 days for surgical patients, p<0.0001). Fewer endograft patients had complications (24% versus 40% for open repair, p<0.05), and the severity of these complications was less, as evidenced by the shorter hospital stays for endovascular patients with complications compared to conventionally treated patients with complications (6.7 +/- 2.4 days versus 22.5 +/- 35.2 days, p<0.05). There were no aneurysm ruptures or late surgical conversions in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AAA who were endograft candidates but who were treated with open repair experienced more morbidity and had more complications than patients treated with stent-grafts. Despite increased comorbidities in the endograft patients, there was no increase in mortality compared to open repair. Both treatments required secondary procedures and appeared to be equally effective in preventing aneurysm rupture up to 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12096937     DOI: 10.1177/152660280200900301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  3 in total

1.  Suprarenal fixation of endograft in abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: focus on renal function.

Authors:  Franco Grego; Paolo Frigatti; Michele Antonello; Sandro Lepidi; Roberto Ragazzi; Vincenzo Iurilli; Pietro Zucchetta; Giovanni P Deriu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Rare complication of esophageal necrosis and perforation after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Neeral R Patel; Abdul Sidiqi; Thomas F Lindsay; Kong Teng Tan; George D Oreopoulos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 3.  Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Elective and Emergent Setting in a Pooled Population of 37,781 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dustin M Thomas; Edward A Hulten; Shane T Ellis; David M F Anderson; Nathan Anderson; Fiora McRae; Jamil A Malik; Todd C Villines; Ahmad M Slim
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.