Literature DB >> 12096790

Sensitisation to swine leukocyte antigens in patients with broadly reactive HLA specific antibodies.

Gertie J Oostingh1, Hugh F S Davies, Kerrie C G Tang, J Andrew Bradley, Craig J Taylor.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that IgG HLA specific antibodies in the sera of highly sensitised patients awaiting renal transplantation can cross-react with swine leukocyte antigens (SLA). In this study we determined the frequency of patient serum IgG HLA specific antibody binding to a porcine lymphocyte panel and the likelihood of locating a cross-match negative pig donor for sensitised patients. Serum samples (n = 82) were obtained from 35 sensitised [current IgG panel reactive antibodies (PRA) > 10%] and seven nonsensitised patients awaiting renal transplantation at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Fifty sera had IgG HLA specific PRA of 11-84%, 20 had IgG PRA of >84% and 12 had 0% PRA (negative controls). Sera were absorbed with porcine erythrocytes to remove xenoreactive natural antibodies and tested for cross-reactive IgG HLA specific antibody binding by flow cytometry against a panel of porcine lymphocytes obtained from 23 human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pigs. A total of 1,884 cross-match combinations were tested and 369 (20%) gave a positive porcine lymphocyte cross-match. For sera from sensitised patients with IgG PRA (11-64%), only 6 of 805 (0.75%) cross-match tests were positive. In contrast, for sera from patients with high IgG PRA (>64%), 363 of 805 (45%) cross-match tests were positive (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the frequency of positive cross-matches between patient sera with IgG PRA 65-84% and highly sensitised patient sera with IgG PRA 85-100% [156/345 (45%) vs. 207/460 (45%)]. This study demonstrates that only patient sera with broadly reactive IgG HLA specific PRA (>64%) cross-react with porcine lymphocytes. If future clinical trials of xenotransplantation are undertaken, it may be of value to select a cross-match-negative pig organ donor for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12096790     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is sensitization to pig antigens detrimental to subsequent allotransplantation?

Authors:  Qi Li; Hidetaka Hara; Zhongqiang Zhang; Michael E Breimer; Yi Wang; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 2.  Genetically-engineered pigs as sources for clinical red blood cell transfusion: What pathobiological barriers need to be overcome?

Authors:  Benjamin Smood; Hidetaka Hara; Leah J Schoel; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Immune Responses of HLA Highly Sensitized and Nonsensitized Patients to Genetically Engineered Pig Cells.

Authors:  Zhongqiang Zhang; Hidetaka Hara; Cassandra Long; Hayato Iwase; Haizhi Qi; Camila Macedo; Massimo Mangiola; Adriana Zeevi; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Martin Wijkstrom
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Examining epitope mutagenesis as a strategy to reduce and eliminate human antibody binding to class II swine leukocyte antigens.

Authors:  Joseph M Ladowski; Gregory R Martens; Luz M Reyes; Vera Hauptfeld-Dolejsek; Matthew Tector; Joseph Tector
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  Humoral Reactivity of Renal Transplant-Waitlisted Patients to Cells From GGTA1/CMAH/B4GalNT2, and SLA Class I Knockout Pigs.

Authors:  Gregory R Martens; Luz M Reyes; Ping Li; James R Butler; Joseph M Ladowski; Jose L Estrada; Richard A Sidner; Devin E Eckhoff; Matt Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects.

Authors:  Martin Wijkstrom; Hayato Iwase; Wayne Paris; Hidetaka Hara; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 7.  Xenotransplantation: immunological hurdles and progress toward tolerance.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Kazuhiko Yamada; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 8.  Low anti-pig antibody levels are key to the success of solid organ xenotransplantation: But is this sufficient?

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Hidetaka Hara
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 9.  Does human leukocyte antigens sensitization matter for xenotransplantation?

Authors:  Guerard W Byrne
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.907

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.