PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To test the effects of a computer-based nursing intervention designed to provide patients and family caregivers with concrete, objective information on symptom management; provide education about disease and treatment; coordinate medical resources; and provide emotional support and counseling. DESIGN: Two-site, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS: A large, urban, midwestern, tertiary-cancer center and a community-based cancer center in a medium-sized midwestern city. SAMPLE: 109 patients newly diagnosed with breast, colon, or lung cancer who were receiving chemotherapy; 54 received standard care, and 55 participated in the intervention group. METHODS: Outcome data were collected via structured telephone interviews at three time points: baseline, midway through the intervention, and one month postintervention. The intervention consisting of nine visits, five in person and four by telephone, was conducted over 18 weeks by advanced practice oncology nurses. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Psychosocial functioning, anxiety, and depression. FINDINGS: Patients who received the intervention had significantly less depression between baseline and the midway point, as well as less anxiety and greater improvement in the role-emotional and mental health subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36 Short Form. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer-care nursing interventions can decrease psychosocial morbidity and improve quality of life for newly diagnosed patients with cancer undergoing treatment. Additional research is needed to understand who benefited most from the intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This nurse-directed intervention resulted in improved mental health for patients; however, physical subscales were not changed. Further work is needed to determine why depression and mental health were affected yet physical health and symptoms did not differ between groups. Results support the important role of nurses in addressing mental health issues in patients and families experiencing cancer.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To test the effects of a computer-based nursing intervention designed to provide patients and family caregivers with concrete, objective information on symptom management; provide education about disease and treatment; coordinate medical resources; and provide emotional support and counseling. DESIGN: Two-site, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS: A large, urban, midwestern, tertiary-cancer center and a community-based cancer center in a medium-sized midwestern city. SAMPLE: 109 patients newly diagnosed with breast, colon, or lung cancer who were receiving chemotherapy; 54 received standard care, and 55 participated in the intervention group. METHODS: Outcome data were collected via structured telephone interviews at three time points: baseline, midway through the intervention, and one month postintervention. The intervention consisting of nine visits, five in person and four by telephone, was conducted over 18 weeks by advanced practice oncology nurses. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Psychosocial functioning, anxiety, and depression. FINDINGS:Patients who received the intervention had significantly less depression between baseline and the midway point, as well as less anxiety and greater improvement in the role-emotional and mental health subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36 Short Form. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer-care nursing interventions can decrease psychosocial morbidity and improve quality of life for newly diagnosed patients with cancer undergoing treatment. Additional research is needed to understand who benefited most from the intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This nurse-directed intervention resulted in improved mental health for patients; however, physical subscales were not changed. Further work is needed to determine why depression and mental health were affected yet physical health and symptoms did not differ between groups. Results support the important role of nurses in addressing mental health issues in patients and families experiencing cancer.
Authors: Elise L Lev; Lucille Sanzero Eller; John Kolassa; Glen Gejerman; Joan Colella; Patricia Lane; Suzanne Scrofine; Michael Esposito; Vincent Lanteri; John Scheuch; Ravi Munver; Bernadette Galli; Richard A Watson; Ihor Sawczuk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mary E Cooley; Ruth McCorkle; George J Knafl; Joan Rimar; Margaret J Barbieri; Marianne Davies; John Murren Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Paula Sherwood; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Victoria L Champion; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Faouzi Azzouz; Sharon Kozachik; Kim Wagler-Ziner; Patrick O Monahan Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Ingeborg C van der Meulen; Anne M May; Wynand J G Ros; Miriam Oosterom; Gert-Jan Hordijk; Ron Koole; J Rob J de Leeuw Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-21