BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for suspected infections in patients with profound neutropenia is the combination of a beta-lactam antibiotic plus an aminoglycoside. Cefepime's broad-spectrum activity makes it an option for initial empirical therapy in neutropenic patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime plus amikacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial empirical treatment of fever in adult haematology patients with severe neutropenia. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre trial, 969 patients with 984 febrile neutropenic episodes were randomized to receive iv amikacin (20 mg/kg every 24 h) combined with either cefepime (2 g every 8 h) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4 g/500 mg every 6 h). Clinical response was determined at 72 h and at completion of therapy. RESULTS:Eight hundred and sixty-seven episodes were assessable for efficacy (432 cefepime, 435piperacillin-tazobactam). The frequency of success without modification of the empirical therapy was nearly identical for cefepime plus amikacin (49%) compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin (51%). Similar rates of success were found for microbiologically documented infection: 40% versus 39%, respectively. Antibiotic modification was necessary in 49% of cefepime and 44% of piperacillin-tazobactam patients. The overall response rate, with or without modification of the assigned treatment, was 94% in both groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 10% of cefepime plus amikacin versus 11% of piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin patients. Mortality due to infection occurred in a total of 10 patients (two cefepime, eight piperacillin-tazobactam). CONCLUSION: The empirical regimen of cefepime plus amikacin is equivalent to piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin in febrile adult haematology patients with severe neutropenia. KEYWORDS: cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, empirical antibiotic therapy, febrile neutropenia, haematological malignancy
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for suspected infections in patients with profound neutropenia is the combination of a beta-lactam antibiotic plus an aminoglycoside. Cefepime's broad-spectrum activity makes it an option for initial empirical therapy in neutropenicpatients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime plus amikacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial empirical treatment of fever in adult haematologypatients with severe neutropenia. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre trial, 969 patients with 984 febrile neutropenic episodes were randomized to receive iv amikacin (20 mg/kg every 24 h) combined with either cefepime (2 g every 8 h) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4 g/500 mg every 6 h). Clinical response was determined at 72 h and at completion of therapy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-seven episodes were assessable for efficacy (432 cefepime, 435 piperacillin-tazobactam). The frequency of success without modification of the empirical therapy was nearly identical for cefepime plus amikacin (49%) compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin (51%). Similar rates of success were found for microbiologically documented infection: 40% versus 39%, respectively. Antibiotic modification was necessary in 49% of cefepime and 44% of piperacillin-tazobactampatients. The overall response rate, with or without modification of the assigned treatment, was 94% in both groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 10% of cefepime plus amikacin versus 11% of piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacinpatients. Mortality due to infection occurred in a total of 10 patients (two cefepime, eight piperacillin-tazobactam). CONCLUSION: The empirical regimen of cefepime plus amikacin is equivalent to piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin in febrile adult haematologypatients with severe neutropenia. KEYWORDS: cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, empirical antibiotic therapy, febrile neutropenia, haematological malignancy
Authors: L Gómez; C Estrada; I Gómez; M Márquez; C Estany; J M Martí; R Bastús; L Cirera; S Quintana; J Garau Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-02-27 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Diana Averbuch; Christina Orasch; Catherine Cordonnier; David M Livermore; Malgorzata Mikulska; Claudio Viscoli; Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; Galina Klyasova; Oscar Marchetti; Dan Engelhard; Murat Akova Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Diana Averbuch; Catherine Cordonnier; David M Livermore; Malgorzata Mikulska; Christina Orasch; Claudio Viscoli; Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; Galina Klyasova; Oscar Marchetti; Dan Engelhard; Murat Akova Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Noemí Puig; Javier de la Rubia; Isidro Jarque; Miguel Salavert; Pau Montesinos; Jaime Sanz; Guillermo Martín; Guillermo Sanz; Susana Cantero; Ignacio Lorenzo; Miguel A Sanz Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: M Ponraj; Biswajit Dubashi; B H Harish; S Kayal; S L Cyriac; Jogamaya Pattnaik; K Ranjith; Unni S Pillai; Naresh Jadhav; Kiran K Matta; Jagdeep Singh; Esha Jaffa; Bhanu Prakash Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Dong-Gun Lee; Sung-Han Kim; Soo Young Kim; Chung-Jong Kim; Wan Beom Park; Young Goo Song; Jung-Hyun Choi Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 3.165