Literature DB >> 12096002

Effect of growth phase and pH on the in vitro activity of a new glycopeptide, oritavancin (LY333328), against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium.

Renee-Claude Mercier1, Carmine Stumpo, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

Oritavancin (LY333328) is a novel glycopeptide with activity against Gram-positive bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. We compared the effects of pH and growth phase on the activity of oritavancin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant E. faecium. Killing curve methods were used to evaluate the effect of growth phase (stationary versus exponential) and pH (6.4, 7.4 and 8.0). An inoculum of 10(6) cfu/mL was used for all experiments. Growth phase of S. aureus and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium did not influence the rate and killing activity of oritavancin. The rate of killing by oritavancin against the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strain was significantly faster and the reduction in cfu/mL at 24 h was significantly greater when the organism was in exponential compared with stationary growth phase (P < 0.05). In exponential growth phase, time to 99.9% killing was achieved in 0.6 +/- 0.01 h for the vancomycin-resistant strain, whereas in stationary growth phase, oritavancin did not decrease the inoculum by 99.9% within 24 h. Oritavancin's activity against S. aureus and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium was not influenced by the pH conditions tested. Oritivancin's killing activity against the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strain was significantly enhanced when tested at pH 7.4 and 8.0 (P < 0.05). Our study has demonstrated that oritavancin's activity does not seem to be influenced by the growth phase of the organisms or the pH of the environment when tested against sensitive strains of S. aureus and E. faecium. However, oritavancin's activity might be reduced against vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains in stationary growth phase, as seen in infective endocarditis or when organisms are exposed to an acidic environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12096002     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  13 in total

1.  [pH values in chronic wounds. Evaluation during modern wound therapy].

Authors:  J Dissemond; M Witthoff; T C Brauns; D Haberer; M Goos
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Population dynamics of antibiotic treatment: a mathematical model and hypotheses for time-kill and continuous-culture experiments.

Authors:  Bruce R Levin; Klas I Udekwu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The effects of different environmental pH on healing of tympanic membrane: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ahmet Akkoc; Hatice Celik; Necmi Arslan; Sule Demirci; Sema Hucumenoglu; Muzaffer Caydere; Derya Oztuna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Nutrient-dependent structural changes in S. aureus peptidoglycan revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Zhou; Lynette Cegelski
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics.

Authors:  Aleksandar F Radovic-Moreno; Timothy K Lu; Vlad A Puscasu; Christopher J Yoon; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Intracellular activity of antibiotics in a model of human THP-1 macrophages infected by a Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variant strain isolated from a cystic fibrosis patient: study of antibiotic combinations.

Authors:  Hoang Anh Nguyen; Olivier Denis; Anne Vergison; Paul M Tulkens; Marc J Struelens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Glycopeptide antibiotics: from conventional molecules to new derivatives.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Yves Van Laethem; Patrice Courvalin; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Vancomycin and oritavancin have different modes of action in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Gary J Patti; Sung Joon Kim; Tsyr-Yan Yu; Evelyne Dietrich; Kelly S E Tanaka; Thomas R Parr; Adel Rafai Far; Jacob Schaefer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Nanocatalysts promote Streptococcus mutans biofilm matrix degradation and enhance bacterial killing to suppress dental caries in vivo.

Authors:  Lizeng Gao; Yuan Liu; Dongyeop Kim; Yong Li; Geelsu Hwang; Pratap C Naha; David P Cormode; Hyun Koo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Quantitative analysis of gentamicin, azithromycin, telithromycin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and oritavancin (LY333328) activities against intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in mouse J774 macrophages.

Authors:  Cristina Seral; Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.