PURPOSE: To report the relationship between infantile esotropia and asymmetry of monocular pursuit tracking. DESIGN: Observational family case series. METHODS: A twin pair discordant for infantile esotropia was confirmed by DNA analysis to be monozygous at 99.95% probability. Digitally sampled electro-oculographic recordings of monocular horizontal pursuit eye movements were performed for the twins and their orthophoric father. RESULTS: Mean directional asymmetry for right and left eyes was 31% and 5% for the esotropic twin, 10% and 8% for the orthophoric twin, and 5% and 6% for the father. The asymmetry was statistically significant only for the deviating right eye of the esotropic twin (P = 0.0217). CONCLUSION: In this family, monocular pursuit asymmetry is probably not a heritable predisposition to infantile esotropia, but a consequence of early strabismus. Discordance of infantile esotropia and pursuit asymmetry in monozygous twins implicates environmental in addition to genetic causes.
PURPOSE: To report the relationship between infantile esotropia and asymmetry of monocular pursuit tracking. DESIGN: Observational family case series. METHODS: A twin pair discordant for infantile esotropia was confirmed by DNA analysis to be monozygous at 99.95% probability. Digitally sampled electro-oculographic recordings of monocular horizontal pursuit eye movements were performed for the twins and their orthophoric father. RESULTS: Mean directional asymmetry for right and left eyes was 31% and 5% for the esotropic twin, 10% and 8% for the orthophoric twin, and 5% and 6% for the father. The asymmetry was statistically significant only for the deviating right eye of the esotropic twin (P = 0.0217). CONCLUSION: In this family, monocular pursuit asymmetry is probably not a heritable predisposition to infantile esotropia, but a consequence of early strabismus. Discordance of infantile esotropia and pursuit asymmetry in monozygous twins implicates environmental in addition to genetic causes.