Literature DB >> 12095715

A survey of the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the UK.

P T Crossman1, R J K Khan, A MacDowell, A C Gardner, N S Reddy, G S Keene.   

Abstract

A survey was undertaken to investigate the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures across the UK. The usual practice at 223 hospitals was recorded for two groups of patients, active and frail. Management of stereotyped fractures, in similar patients, varied between hospitals. There was also variation between specialists within some hospitals: two or more of the alternative methods of treatment were in routine use for active patients at 22% of hospitals and for frail patients at 27%. Overall, for active patients, bipolar hemiarthroplasty was undertaken at 41% of hospitals, internal fixation at 37%, unipolar hemiarthroplasty at 32% and total hip replacement at 16%. Cemented prostheses were used in 74% of arthroplasties for active patients. For frail patients, hemiarthroplasty with an Austin Moore or Thompson prostheses was undertaken at 94% of hospitals; bipolar prostheses were used at 8%; internal fixation was undertaken at 1%. Cement was used in 46% of hemiarthroplasties. These findings indicate a lack of consensus in aspects of the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures and are likely to reflect difficulties in determining "best practice."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095715     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Cemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasty in patients with intracapsular neck of femur fractures: survival analysis of 1,670 procedures.

Authors:  S K Khan; S S Jameson; A Sims; J A'Court; M R Reed; A Rangan; S D Muller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-27

2.  Adherence to a femoral neck fracture treatment guideline.

Authors:  Stephanie M Zielinski; Max A Meeuwis; Martin J Heetveld; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Gert R Roukema; Peter Patka; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cemented unipolar or modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients - which is better?

Authors:  Abdul Q Khan; Julfiqar Mohammad; Rayed Qamar; Yasir S Siddiqui; Aamir B Sabir; Mazhar Abbas
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  More intramedullary nails and arthroplasties for treatment of hip fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  Cecilia Rogmark; Curt-Lennart Spetz; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhiwei Jia; Fan Ding; Yaohong Wu; Wei Li; Haifeng Li; Deli Wang; Qing He; Dike Ruan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Bone cement leaking into iliac vein during artificial femoral head replacement: A case report.

Authors:  Zhencun Cai; Chengzhe Piao; Ming Sun; Hongyu Zhou; Zhenhuai Gao; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ahmed Fikry Elmenshawy; Khaled Hamed Salem
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

8.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Qianyu Zhuang; Xisheng Weng; Lei Zhou; Yanyan Bian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Current trends of stem use in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Ki-Choul Kim; Byung-Ho Yoon; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08-05

10.  Cemented versus uncemented hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Na Li; Lei Zhong; Chang Wang; Meng Xu; Wei Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.