Literature DB >> 12095448

Detection of West Nile virus in oral and cloacal swabs collected from bird carcasses.

Nicholas Komar1, Robert Lanciotti, Richard Bowen, Stanley Langevin, Michel Bunning.   

Abstract

We evaluated if postmortem cloacal and oral swabs could replace brain tissue as a specimen for West Nile virus (WNV) detection. WNV was detected in all three specimen types from 20 dead crows and jays with an average of >10(5) WNV PFU in each. These findings suggest that testing cloacal or oral swabs might be a low-resource approach to detect WNV in dead birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095448      PMCID: PMC2730331          DOI: 10.3201/eid0807.020157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Since 1999, surveillance of bird deaths has become a standard epidemiologic method for detecting the spread and continued presence of West Nile virus (formal name: West Nile virus [WNV]) transmission throughout the eastern United States (1). In 2000 alone, approximately 13,000 bird carcasses were tested for WNV (2). Substantial resources are required to accomplish the tasks associated with this novel type of arbovirus surveillance: transport of the avian carcasses to a laboratory (often distinct from the microbiology laboratory where diagnostic testing will be performed), organ removal, tissue maceration and clarification, and testing of tissue homogenates. We considered ways to simplify these tasks. Given that birds with acute WNV infection frequently shed the virus in cloacal or oral cavities (3–6) and that we have detected very high WNV titers (e.g. 106 PFU) on cloacal and oral (nasopharyngeal) swabs of corvid and other passerine birds with experimentally induced, acute WNV infections (N. Komar, unpub. data), we hypothesized that cloacal swabs or oral swabs from carcasses could replace brain samples, the preferred tissues to test for WNV infection in corvid carcasses (7).

The Study

We collected postmortem specimens from 20 corvids, including 12 American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos), 4 Fish Crows (Corvus ossifragus), and 4 Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata), that had died (or in one case had been euthanized after being moribund for 24 hours) after experimental infection with the New York 1999 strain of WNV. (The modes of infection, sampling protocol, and resulting pathogenesis will be described separately.) Brain and other organs were harvested, and postmortem cloacal and oral swabs were collected (using standard cotton- or Dacron-tipped applicators) in 0.5-mL physiological buffer containing antibiotics, within 24 hours of death. All specimens were frozen at -70°C until assayed for virus content by Vero plaque assay and for WNV-specific RNA by TaqMan reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), as previously described (8). We detected WNV RNA in all postmortem brain tissue samples as well as cloacal and oral swabs. Infectious WNV particles were detected in all but one specimen, a cloacal swab taken from a Fish Crow. Viral titrations and quantitative TaqMan RT-PCR indicated that the concentrations of WNV averaged >105 in all three specimen types (Table).
Table

Mean logarithmic titers of West Nile virus (WNV) infectious particles, determined by Vero plaque assay and TaqMan reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reactiona

Specimen type
(Mean Vero log PFU [range]/Mean TaqMan log PFU equivalents [range])
SpeciesBrainOral swabCloacal swab
American Crow8.2 [5.9–8.8]/7.1 [5.3–7.7]7.3 [4.1–7.7]/6.6 [4.6–7.1]6.4 [3.8–7.4]/6.9 [6.1–7.3]
Fish Crow6.6 [4.1–6.9]/5.8 [4.8–6.2]7.0 [1.4–7.6]/6.1 [3.2–6.7]6.8 [<0.4–7.4]/6.0 [2.3–6.6]
Blue Jay8.0 [7.3–8.2]/6.3b [6.2–6.3]7.1b [5.3–7.4]/5.7b [4.4–6.0]5.8 [3.0–6.3]/6.7b [5.6–7.0]

aIn postmortem samples of brain tissue (1 cm3), and oral and cloacal swabs for 12 American Crows, 4 Fish Crows, and 4 Blue Jays experimentally infected with the New York 1999 strain of WNV.
bThis value determined from only two birds.

aIn postmortem samples of brain tissue (1 cm3), and oral and cloacal swabs for 12 American Crows, 4 Fish Crows, and 4 Blue Jays experimentally infected with the New York 1999 strain of WNV.
bThis value determined from only two birds.

Conclusions

Avian mortality surveillance for WNV targets fresh carcasses (generally dead <24 h), especially corvids, for detection of infectious virus particles or RNA in brain or other viscera. We have shown that postmortem oral and cloacal swabs, in addition to brain, are effective samples to collect for WNV detection in experimentally infected corvids. A potential implication of these findings, pending field trials using corvids and other species routinely collected as part of avian mortality surveillance, is that WNV may be detected by simply collecting swabs from carcasses and forwarding the swabs (frozen) to a virology laboratory for testing. Eliminating multiple steps currently necessary for WNV testing of bird carcasses may conserve valuable public health resources and reduce the risk of exposure for laboratory personnel.
  8 in total

1.  Pathogenicity of West Nile virus for turkeys.

Authors:  D E Swayne; J R Beck; S Zaki
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

2.  Pathogenicity of West Nile virus in chickens.

Authors:  D A Senne; J C Pedersen; D L Hutto; W D Taylor; B J Schmitt; B Panigrahy
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

3.  Rapid detection of west nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay.

Authors:  R S Lanciotti; A J Kerst; R S Nasci; M S Godsey; C J Mitchell; H M Savage; N Komar; N A Panella; B C Allen; K E Volpe; B S Davis; J T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Crow deaths as a sentinel surveillance system for West Nile virus in the northeastern United States, 1999.

Authors:  M Eidson; N Komar; F Sorhage; R Nelson; T Talbot; F Mostashari; R McLean
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Experimental infection of chickens as candidate sentinels for West Nile virus.

Authors:  S A Langevin; M Bunning; B Davis; N Komar
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Fatal encephalitis and myocarditis in young domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) caused by West Nile virus.

Authors:  D E Swayne; J R Beck; C S Smith; W J Shieh; S R Zaki
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Comparative West Nile virus detection in organs of naturally infected American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos).

Authors:  N A Panella; A J Kerst; R S Lanciotti; P Bryant; B Wolf; N Komar
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Widespread West Nile virus activity, eastern United States, 2000.

Authors:  A A Marfin; L R Petersen; M Eidson; J Miller; J Hadler; C Farello; B Werner; G L Campbell; M Layton; P Smith; E Bresnitz; M Cartter; J Scaletta; G Obiri; M Bunning; R C Craven; J T Roehrig; K G Julian; S R Hinten; D J Gubler
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.883

  8 in total
  23 in total

1.  On the Fly: Interactions Between Birds, Mosquitoes, and Environment That Have Molded West Nile Virus Genomic Structure Over Two Decades.

Authors:  Nisha K Duggal; Kate E Langwig; Gregory D Ebel; Aaron C Brault
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  West Nile virus surveillance and diagnostics: A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Michael A Drebot; Robbin Lindsay; Ian K Barker; Peter A Buck; Margaret Fearon; Fiona Hunter; Paul Sockett; Harvey Artsob
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03

3.  DETERMINING RAPTOR SPECIES AND TISSUE SENSITIVITY FOR IMPROVED WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE.

Authors:  Kendall L Kritzik; Gail Kratz; Nicholas A Panella; Kristen Burkhalter; Rebecca J Clark; Brad J Biggerstaff; Nicholas Komar
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 4.  North American encephalitic arboviruses.

Authors:  Larry E Davis; J David Beckham; Kenneth L Tyler
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  Rapid antigen-capture assay to detect West Nile virus in dead corvids.

Authors:  Robbin Lindsay; Ian k Barker; Gopi Nayar; Michael Drebot; Sharon Calvin; Cherie Scammell; Cheril Sachvie; Tracy Scammell-La Fleur Fleur; Antonia Dibernardo; Maya Andonova; Harvey Artsob
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Corvidae feather pulp and West Nile virus detection.

Authors:  Douglas E Docherty; Renee Romaine Long; Kathryn M Griffin; Emi K Saito
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  West Nile virus infection in American Robins: new insights on dose response.

Authors:  Kaci K VanDalen; Jeffrey S Hall; Larry Clark; Robert G McLean; Cynthia Smeraski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  West Nile virus detection in American crows.

Authors:  Sarah A Yaremych; Richard E Warner; Marshall T Van de Wyngaerde; Adam M Ringia; Richard Lampman; Robert J Novak
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  West Nile virus infection in commercial waterfowl operation, Wisconsin.

Authors:  Jennifer K Meece; Tamara A Kronenwetter-Koepel; Mary F Vandermause; Kurt D Reed
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus.

Authors:  Nicholas Komar; Stanley Langevin; Steven Hinten; Nicole Nemeth; Eric Edwards; Danielle Hettler; Brent Davis; Richard Bowen; Michel Bunning
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.