Literature DB >> 12095154

Flexible low-intensity combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Arumugam Manoharan1, Annette Trickett, Yiu Lam Kwan, Timothy Brighton.   

Abstract

Twenty-five patients aged 57 to 88 years (median, 70 years) with acute myeloid leukemia were treated with a flexible low-intensity treatment regimen comprising mitozantrone (mitoxantrone) 6 mg/m2 administered by intravenous infusion x3 days, cytarabine 10 mg/m2 subcutaneously every 12 hours x7 to 14 days, and etoposide 100 mg orally x7 to 14 days. Seventeen of these patients had a preexisting myelodysplastic syndrome. The clinical response was correlated to the results of cytogenetic studies (23 patients) and of viability studies of leukemic blasts (7 patients). Eleven of the 25 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 8 achieved partial remission (PR), and 4 showed no response. There was 1 toxic death, and 1 patient died soon (1 week) after presentation. Treatment was well tolerated. Although myelotoxicity occurred regularly, the recovery time was < or = 3 weeks for most of the responding patients. Duration of survival for patients who had CR has ranged from 4+ to 43+ months and for patients who had PR, 3 to 16 months. Irrespective of the remission status (CR or PR), responding patients with favorable (n = 1) or intermediate (n = 10) cytogenetic findings had a significantly better survival time (median, 14 months) than did those with unfavorable (n = 7) cytogenetic findings (median, 5 months). In vitro studies showed a progressive reduction in the number of circulating blasts. The number of viable blasts 3 days after initiation of therapy appeared to give an early indication of clinical response. Treatment with a flexible low-intensity protocol seems to achieve results comparable with those reported for intensive antileukemia therapy and has much less toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095154     DOI: 10.1007/bf02982117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  28 in total

1.  Low-dose cytarabine in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  A Manoharan; M J Leyden; J Sullivan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1984-11-10       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Phase-II trial of idarubicin, fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, and filgrastim (Ida-FLAG) for treatment of refractory, relapsed, and secondary AML.

Authors:  H T Steinmetz; A Schulz; P Staib; C Scheid; A Glasmacher; A Neufang; J Franklin; H Tesch; V Diehl; P Dias Wickramanayake
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Mitoxantrone versus daunorubicin in induction-consolidation chemotherapy--the value of low-dose cytarabine for maintenance of remission, and an assessment of prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: final report. European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Hovon Group.

Authors:  B Löwenberg; S Suciu; E Archimbaud; H Haak; P Stryckmans; R de Cataldo; A W Dekker; Z N Berneman; A Thyss; J van der Lelie; P Sonneveld; G Visani; G Fillet; M Hayat; A Hagemeijer; G Solbu; R Zittoun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Apoptosis of L929 cells by etoposide: a quantitative and kinetic approach.

Authors:  G Bonelli; M C Sacchi; G Barbiero; F Duranti; G Goglio; L Verdun di Cantogno; J S Amenta; M Piacentini; C Tacchetti; F M Baccino
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  C P Leith; K J Kopecky; J Godwin; T McConnell; M L Slovak; I M Chen; D R Head; F R Appelbaum; C L Willman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The use of an all oral chemotherapy (idarubicin and etoposide) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in the elderly: a report of toxicity and efficacy.

Authors:  G H Jackson; P R Taylor; A Iqbal; M J Galloway; G Turner; A Haynes; P J Hamilton; N Russell; S J Proctor
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Low-dose cytarabine versus intensive chemotherapy in the treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in the elderly.

Authors:  H Tilly; S Castaigne; D Bordessoule; P Casassus; P Y Le Prisé; G Tertian; B Desablens; M Henry-Amar; L Degos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Low dose cytosine arabinoside: partial remission of acute myeloid leukaemia without evidence of differentiation induction.

Authors:  M Leyden; A Manoharan; A Boyd; Z M Cheng; J Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Refined chromosome study helps define prognostic subgroups in most patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukaemia.

Authors:  J J Yunis; M Lobell; M A Arnesen; M M Oken; M G Mayer; R E Rydell; R D Brunning
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly with low-dose cytarabine, hydroxyurea, and calcitriol.

Authors:  C A Slapak; J F Desforges; T Fogaren; K B Miller
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 10.047

View more
  1 in total

1.  Flexible low-intensity combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, phase II study.

Authors:  Arumugam Manoharan; John Reynolds; Jane Matthews; Heather Baxter; Juliana Di Iulio; Michael Leahy; Surender Juneja
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.