Literature DB >> 12094837

Cross-mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha System and NIC for unified nursing language system development. International Classification for Nursing Practice. International Council of Nurses. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Home Health Care Classification. Nursing Interventions Classification.

S Hyun1, H A Park.   

Abstract

Nursing language plays an important role in describing and defining nursing phenomena and nursing actions. There are numerous vocabularies describing nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes in nursing. However, the lack of a standardized unified nursing language is considered a problem for further development of the discipline of nursing. In an effort to unify the nursing languages, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) has proposed the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) as a unified nursing language system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inclusiveness and expressiveness of the ICNP terms by cross-mapping them with the existing nursing terminologies, specifically the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) taxonomy I, the Omaha System, the Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) and the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Nine hundred and seventy-four terms from these four classifications were cross-mapped with the ICNP terms. This was performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Composing a Nursing Diagnosis and Guidelines for Composing a Nursing Intervention, which were suggested by the ICNP development team. An expert group verified the results. The ICNP Phenomena Classification described 87.5% of the NANDA diagnoses, 89.7% of the HHCC diagnoses and 72.7% of the Omaha System problem classification scheme. The ICNP Action Classification described 79.4% of the NIC interventions, 80.6% of the HHCC interventions and 71.4% of the Omaha System intervention scheme. The results of this study suggest that the ICNP has a sound starting structure for a unified nursing language system and can be used to describe most of the existing terminologies. Recommendations for the addition of terms to the ICNP are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12094837     DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00121.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Nurs Rev        ISSN: 0020-8132            Impact factor:   2.871


  5 in total

1.  Representing critical care data using the clinical care classification.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Moss; Mantana Damrongsak; Kathleen Gallichio
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

2.  The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors.

Authors:  Bonnie L Westra; Cristina Oancea; Kay Savik; Karen Dorman Marek
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  A proposal for an Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS): a Delphi study.

Authors:  R Ranegger; W O Hackl; E Ammenwerth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Embedding Nursing Interventions into the World Health Organization's International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI).

Authors:  Nicola Fortune; Nicholas R Hardiker; Gillian Strudwick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy.

Authors:  Maria-Eulàlia Juvé Udina; Maribel Gonzalez Samartino; Cristina Matud Calvo
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2012-07-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.