Literature DB >> 12094535

Towards sets of hazardous waste indicators. Essential tools for modern industrial management.

Peter J Peterson1, Asa Granados.   

Abstract

Decision-makers require useful tools, such as indicators, to help them make environmentally sound decisions leading to effective management of hazardous wastes. Four hazardous waste indicators are being tested for such a purpose by several countries within the Sustainable Development Indicator Programme of the United Nations Commission for Sustainable Development. However, these indicators only address the 'down-stream' end-of-pipe industrial situation. More creative thinking is clearly needed to develop a wider range of indicators that not only reflects all aspects of industrial production that generates hazardous waste but considers socio-economic implications of the waste as well. Sets of useful and innovative indicators are proposed that could be applied to the emerging paradigm shift away from conventional end-of-pipe management actions and towards preventive strategies that are being increasingly adopted by industry often in association with local and national governments. A methodological and conceptual framework for the development of a core-set of hazardous waste indicators has been developed. Some of the indicator sets outlined quantify preventive waste management strategies (including indicators for cleaner production, hazardous waste reduction/minimization and life cycle analysis), whilst other sets address proactive strategies (including changes in production and consumption patterns, eco-efficiency, eco-intensity and resource productivity). Indicators for quantifying transport of hazardous wastes are also described. It was concluded that a number of the indicators proposed could now be usefully implemented as management tools using existing industrial and economic data. As cleaner production technologies and waste minimization approaches are more widely deployed, and industry integrates environmental concerns at all levels of decision-making, it is expected that the necessary data for construction of the remaining indicators will soon become available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12094535     DOI: 10.1007/bf02987490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  2 in total

1.  Precautionary principle and/or risk assessment: A penitence in contemporary political culture.

Authors:  F Bro-Rasmussen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management: development and technical content.

Authors:  G A Webb
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.394

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Environmental assessment in health care organizations.

Authors:  Isabel Romero; María Carmen Carnero
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.