Literature DB >> 12094372

Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review.

Markku Miettinen1, Wa'el El-Rifai, Leslie H L Sobin, Jerzy Lasota.   

Abstract

This paper reviews data on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). These tumors are specific KIT-expressing and KIT-signaling-driven mesenchymal tumors, many of which have KIT-activating mutations. GISTs occur in the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract and may also arise from the omentum, mesenteries, and retroperitoneum. They range from small benign tumors to sarcomas at all sites of occurrence. A KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor, STI-571 (imatinib [Gleevec]; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), has recently shown promise in the treatment of metastatic GISTs. Understanding the natural history of GIST before introduction of STI-571 will help assess the impact and position of this new treatment. The frequency of benign versus malignant GISTs varies between sites. Benign GISTs outnumber malignant GISTs in the stomach, whereas malignant GISTs are more common in the intestines. Tumors that have metastasized at presentation have a very poor prognosis. Traditionally, the 3 key prognostic factors have been mitotic rate, tumor size, and site. Tumors that are small (< or =2 cm) and show mitotic activity not exceeding 5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPFs) have an excellent prognosis, probably independent of site, although this has not been shown specifically for all sites. In the stomach, most epithelioid GISTs are benign, provided that mitotic counts do not exceed 5/50 HPFs. However, a small proportion of tumors apparently lacking mitotic activity do metastasize. Tumors with a mitotic rate >5/50 HPFs usually have a malignant behavior. The Ki67 index may help identify tumors with malignant potential, but large site-specific series are not yet available. Genetic markers, including DNA-copy number changes, telomerase activity, and KIT mutation status, may be useful in more accurately identifying tumors with malignant potential. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12094372     DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2002.124123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  148 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: report of two unusual cases.

Authors:  Mário Rodrigues Montemor Neto; Tiago Noguchi Machuca; Renato Valmassoni Pinho; Lucas Dan Yuasa; Luiz Fernando Bleggi-Torres
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the retroperitoneum: CT and MR findings.

Authors:  Hidemasa Takao; Ko Yamahira; Ippei Doi; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Duodenal gastrointestinal stroma tumours: difficulties of an individualized risk assessment and controversies in surgical therapy.

Authors:  D Vallböhmer; W T Knoefel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  eComment. gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Georgios Dimitrakakis; Despoina Stamou; Stratos S Sofos; Inetzi A Dimitrakaki
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04

5.  A comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Xiao Feng; Shicai Ye; Jie Wang; Jian Liang; Shao Mai; Meifen Lai; Huayang Feng; Guo Wang; Yu Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Computed tomography imaging characteristics of synchronous gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with gastric cancer and correlation with clinicopathological findings.

Authors:  Zhenshan Shi; Qian Zhuang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-13

7.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: outcomes of surgical management and analysis of prognostic variables.

Authors:  Haluk R Unalp; Hayrullah Derici; Erdinc Kamer; Ali D Bozdag; Ercument Tarcan; Mehmet A Onal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Analysis of a case with disappearance of the primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor and progressive liver metastases under long-term treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Silke Cameron; Theodoros Savvoukidis; Thomas Armbrust; Florian Haller; Julia Kitz; László Füzesi; Giuliano Ramadori
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Impact of KIT and PDGFRA gene mutations on prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors after complete primary tumor resection.

Authors:  Ying-Yong Hou; Florian Grabellus; Frank Weber; Yang Zhou; Yun-Shan Tan; Jun Li; Kun-Tang Shen; Jin Qin; Yi-Hong Sun; Xin-Yu Qin; Maximillian Bockhorn; Guido Gerken; Christoph E Broelsch; Andrea Frilling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  p16 expression differentiates high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor and predicts poor outcome.

Authors:  Michael Schmieder; Sebastian Wolf; Bettina Danner; Susanne Stoehr; Markus S Juchems; Peter Wuerl; Doris Henne-Bruns; Uwe Knippschild; Cornelia Hasel; Klaus Kramer
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.