OBJECTIVE: To study the results of orbital decompression based on the severity of preoperative proptosis. DESIGN: A retrospective noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine orbits in 23 patients with thyroid-related orbitopathy at a university-based referral center. INTERVENTION: Graded orbital decompression was performed in all patients based on the severity of preoperative exophthalmometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exophthalmometry, visual acuity, margin-to-reflex distance, prism cover testing, and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Mean proptosis reduction in all orbits was 6.4 +/- 2.7 mm (P < 0.01). In group 1 (preoperative exophthalmometry <22 mm), proptosis decreased with a mean of 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm (P < 0.01); mean proptosis reduction was 6.0 +/- 2.3 mm (P < 0.01) and 8.9 +/- 3.4 mm (P < 0.01) in group 2 (exophthalmometry between 22-25 mm) and group 3 (exophthalmometry >25 mm), respectively. In four of five eyes with compressive optic neuropathy there was an improvement of best-corrected visual acuity of 2 lines or more. Margin-to-reflex distance of the upper and lower lids and intraocular pressure were reduced in all groups. New-onset diplopia developed in two patients (8.7%); 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) who had diplopia preoperatively had persistent diplopia postoperatively. Two patients (13.3%) had relief of diplopia postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Graded orbital decompression based on the severity of preoperative exophthalmometry is useful to determine the type and amount of orbital surgery to be performed.
OBJECTIVE: To study the results of orbital decompression based on the severity of preoperative proptosis. DESIGN: A retrospective noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine orbits in 23 patients with thyroid-related orbitopathy at a university-based referral center. INTERVENTION: Graded orbital decompression was performed in all patients based on the severity of preoperative exophthalmometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exophthalmometry, visual acuity, margin-to-reflex distance, prism cover testing, and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Mean proptosis reduction in all orbits was 6.4 +/- 2.7 mm (P < 0.01). In group 1 (preoperative exophthalmometry <22 mm), proptosis decreased with a mean of 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm (P < 0.01); mean proptosis reduction was 6.0 +/- 2.3 mm (P < 0.01) and 8.9 +/- 3.4 mm (P < 0.01) in group 2 (exophthalmometry between 22-25 mm) and group 3 (exophthalmometry >25 mm), respectively. In four of five eyes with compressive optic neuropathy there was an improvement of best-corrected visual acuity of 2 lines or more. Margin-to-reflex distance of the upper and lower lids and intraocular pressure were reduced in all groups. New-onset diplopia developed in two patients (8.7%); 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) who had diplopia preoperatively had persistent diplopia postoperatively. Two patients (13.3%) had relief of diplopia postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Graded orbital decompression based on the severity of preoperative exophthalmometry is useful to determine the type and amount of orbital surgery to be performed.
Authors: Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Hajar Jafari; Mehdi Mazloumi; Syed Ziaeddin Tabatabaie; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Narges Hasanlou; Seyed-Mojtaba Abtahi; Robert A Goldberg Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Courtney Y Kauh; Shivani Gupta; Raymond S Douglas; Victor M Elner; Christine C Nelson; Leslie M Niziol; Alon Kahana Journal: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.746
Authors: Sang-Rog Oh; Jonathan D Tung; Ayelet Priel; Leah Levi; David B Granet; Bobby S Korn; Don O Kikkawa Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.411