Literature DB >> 12093026

Resistance and tolerance in a host plant-holoparasitic plant interaction: genetic variation and costs.

Tanja Koskela1, Susanna Puustinen, Veikko Salonen, Pia Mutikainen.   

Abstract

Host organisms are believed to evolve defense mechanisms (i.e., resistance and/or tolerance) under selective pressures exerted by natural enemies. A prerequisite for the evolution of resistance and tolerance is the existence of genetic variation in these traits for natural selection to act. However, selection for resistance and/or tolerance may be constrained by negative genetic correlations with other traits that affect host fitness. We studied genetic variation in resistance and tolerance against parasitic infection and the potential fitness costs associated with these traits using a novel study system, namely the interaction between a flowering plant and a parasitic plant. In this system, parasitic infection has significant negative effects on host growth and reproduction and may thus act as a selective agent. We conducted a greenhouse experiment in which we grew host plants, Urtica dioica, that originated from a single natural population and represented 20 maternal families either uninfected or infected with the holoparasitic dodder, Cuscuta europaea. that originated from the same site. We calculated correlations among resistance, tolerance, and host performance to test for costs of resistance and tolerance. We measured resistance as parasite performance (quantitative resistance) and tolerance as the slopes of regressions relating the vegetative and reproductive biomass of host plants to damage level (measured as parasite biomass). We observed significant differences among host families in parasite resistance and in parasite tolerance in terms of reproductive biomass, a result that suggests genetic variation in these traits. Furthermore, we found differences in resistance and tolerance between female and male host plants. In addition, the correlations indicate costs of resistance in terms of host growth and reproduction and costs of tolerance in terms of host reproduction. Our results thus indicate that host tolerance and resistance can evolve as a response to infection by a parasitic plant and that costs of resistance and tolerance may be one factor maintaining genetic variation in these traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12093026     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01403.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  18 in total

Review 1.  The roles of tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism.

Authors:  David P Edwards
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-05-30

Review 2.  Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals.

Authors:  Lars Råberg; Andrea L Graham; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Genetic variation changes the interactions between the parasitic plant-ecosystem engineer Rhinanthus and its hosts.

Authors:  Jennifer K Rowntree; Duncan D Cameron; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Impact of initial pathogen density on resistance and tolerance in a polymorphic disease resistance gene system in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Fabrice Roux; Liping Gao; Joy Bergelson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic variation in resistance, but not tolerance, to a protozoan parasite in the monarch butterfly.

Authors:  Thierry Lefèvre; Amanda Jo Williams; Jacobus C de Roode
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Development of resistance to cyfluthrin and naphthalene among Daphnia magna.

Authors:  John M Brausch; Philip N Smith
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Heritable variation in host tolerance and resistance inferred from a wild host-parasite system.

Authors:  Elise Mazé-Guilmo; Géraldine Loot; David J Páez; Thierry Lefèvre; Simon Blanchet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Direct and ecological costs of resistance and tolerance in the stinging nettle.

Authors:  Susanna Puustinen; Tanja Koskela; Pia Mutikainen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Impacts of a native parasitic plant on an introduced and a native host species: implications for the control of an invasive weed.

Authors:  Jane Prider; Jennifer Watling; José M Facelli
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  The evolution of disease resistance and tolerance in spatially structured populations.

Authors:  Felix Horns; Michael E Hood
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.