Literature DB >> 12093023

The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks.

Carlos López-Fanjul1, Almudena Fernández, Miguel A Toro.   

Abstract

The effect of population bottlenecks on the components of the genetic variance generated by two neutral independent epistatic loci has been studied theoretically (VA, additive; VD, dominant; VAA, additive x additive; VAD, additive x dominant; VDD; dominant x dominant components of variance). Nonoverdominance and overdominance models were considered, covering all possible types of marginal gene action at the single locus level. The variance components in an infinitely large panmictic population (ancestral components) were compared with their expected values at equilibrium, after t consecutive bottlenecks of equal size N (derived components). Formulae were obtained in terms of allele frequencies and effects at each locus and the corresponding epistatic value. An excess of VA after bottlenecks can be assigned to two sources: (1) the spatiotemporal changes in the marginal average effects of gene substitution alpha(i), which are equal to zero only for additive gene action within and between loci; and (2) the covariance between alpha2(i) and the heterozygosity at the loci involved, which is generated by dominance, with or without epistasis. Numerical examples were analyzed, indicating that an increase in VA after bottlenecks will only occur if its ancestral value is minimal or very small. For the nonoverdominance model with weak reinforcing epistasis, that increase has been detected only for extreme frequencies of the negative allele at one or both loci. With strong epistasis, however, this result can be extended to a broad range of intermediate frequencies. With no epistasis, the same qualitative results were found, indicating that dominance can be considered as the primary cause of an increase in VA following bottlenecks. In parallel, the derived total nonadditive variance exceeded its ancestral value (V(NA) = V(D) + V(AA) + V(AD) + V(DD)) for a range of combinations of allele frequencies covering those for an excess of VA and for very large frequencies of the negative allele at both loci. For the overdominance model, an increase in V(A) and V(NA) was respectively observed for equilibrium (intermediate) frequencies at one or both loci or for extreme frequencies at both loci. For all models, the magnitude of the change of V(A) and V(NA) was inversely related to N and t. At low levels of inbreeding, the between-line variance was not affected by the type of gene action. For the models considered, the results indicate that it is unlikely that the rate of evolution may be accelerated after population bottlenecks, in spite of occasional increments of the derived V(A) over its ancestral value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12093023     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.

Authors:  Carlos López-Fanjul; Almudena Fernández; Miguel A Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Redistribution of gene frequency and changes of genetic variation following a bottleneck in population size.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Under neutrality, Q(ST) < or = F(ST) when there is dominance in an island model.

Authors:  Jérôme Goudet; Guillaume Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effect of dominance on the use of the QST - FST contrast to detect natural selection on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Carlos López-Fanjul; Almudena Fernández; Miguel A Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Population bottlenecks increase additive genetic variance but do not break a selection limit in rain forest Drosophila.

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Yvonne Willi; Torsten N Kristensen; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The action of purifying selection, mutation and drift on fitness epistatic systems.

Authors:  Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Armando Caballero; Aurora García-Dorado; Carlos López-Fanjul
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of Bayesian analysis of additive and dominance genetic variances in noninbred pedigrees.

Authors:  Patrik Waldmann; Jon Hallander; Fabian Hoti; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Current applications of models of genetic effects with interactions across the genome.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation in Sitobion avenae populations from both sides of the Qinling Mountains.

Authors:  Xianliang Huang; Deguang Liu; Da Wang; Xiaoqin Shi; Jean-Christophe Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multilocus epistasis, linkage, and genetic variance in breeding populations with few parents.

Authors:  D A Tabanao; J Yu; R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 5.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.