Literature DB >> 12092937

The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations.

Aisha Gilliam1, David Davis, Tracey Barrington, Romel Lacson, Gary Uhl, Ursula Phoenix.   

Abstract

Stakeholder participation in evaluation has surfaced as a major factor contributing to the effectiveness of HIV prevention programs. In recognition of the multiple benefits, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has used a framework to involve stakeholders in the evaluation of its programs. This article describes the framework used by the CDC and provides examples of four studies that involved various stakeholders from health departments, community-based organizations, and community planning groups to national and regional organizations in designing and implementing evaluations that yielded results useful for program improvement. The participatory process involved stakeholders in each of the four phases of the framework: evaluation planning, implementation, development of action plans, and dissemination. Lessons learned include the importance of having a facilitator to coordinate activities and ongoing communication with those involved in the evaluation. Stakeholders shared that using the evaluation results for action planning was beneficial for improving their programs. Despite many challenges faced in the stakeholder evaluation process, most stakeholders agreed that many benefits grew out of the multiple perspectives presented and understanding of the service agencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12092937     DOI: 10.1521/aeap.14.4.5.23878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev        ISSN: 0899-9546


  6 in total

1.  Balancing empiricism and local cultural knowledge in the design of prevention research.

Authors:  Philip A Fisher; Thomas J Ball
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program.

Authors:  Lynda A Anderson; Margaret K Gwaltney; Demia L Sundra; Ross C Brownson; Mary Kane; Alan W Cross; Richard Mack; Randy Schwartz; Tom Sims; White R Carol
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Engaging partners to initiate evaluation efforts: tactics used and lessons learned from the prevention research centers program.

Authors:  Demia Sundra Wright; Lynda A Anderson; Ross C Brownson; Margaret K Gwaltney; Jennifer Scherer; Alan W Cross; Robert M Goodman; Randy Schwartz; Tom Sims; Carol R White
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Capacity building efforts and perceptions for wildlife surveillance to detect zoonotic pathogens: comparing stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Jessica S Schwind; Tracey Goldstein; Kate Thomas; Jonna A K Mazet; Woutrina A Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The role of researchers in disseminating evidence to public health practice settings: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Allese B McVay; Katherine A Stamatakis; Julie A Jacobs; Rachel G Tabak; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-06-10

6.  A multilevel approach for promoting physical activity in rural communities: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alan M Beck; Amy A Eyler; J Aaron Hipp; Abby C King; Rachel G Tabak; Yan Yan; Rodrigo S Reis; Dixie D Duncan; Amanda S Gilbert; Natalicio H Serrano; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.