Literature DB >> 12092877

Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria--a report of over 1,000 cases.

S N Datta1, G M Allen, R Evans, K C Vaughton, M G Lucas.   

Abstract

Over a 5-year period, 1007 patients with haematuria were investigated, using a protocol based on ultrasonography as the upper tract imaging modality of choice. Intravenous urography (IVU) was only used in selected individuals, including those patients with bladder cancer suspected on cystoscopy, suspicious or malignant cytology, previous investigation for haematuria, on-going haematuria at the time of their clinic visit, a history of flank pain or hydronephrosis on ultrasonography. Of this series, 840 (83%) had visible haematuria, 158 (15%) had microscopic or chemical haematuria and 9 (0.9%) had unspecified haematuria. A total of 133 bladder transitional cell tumours, 21 renal cell cancers and 2 upper tract transitional cell cancers (TCC) were diagnosed. The sensitivity of ultrasound with respect to bladder cancer was 63% and the specificity 99%. The odds ratio of diagnosing cancer in patients with visible haematuria compared to microscopic or unspecified haematuria was 3.3. No upper tract tumours were missed using this investigational protocol. An ultrasonography-based protocol could miss fewer upper tract TCCs than a standard IVU-based service would miss renal cell cancer. Provided there is no history of flank pain, no malignant cytology, no hydronephrosis and no previously investigated haematuria, IVU could be safely omitted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12092877      PMCID: PMC2503839     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  6 in total

1.  Detection of renal and renal pelvic tumours with urography and ultrasonography.

Authors:  A Aslaksen; O J Halvorsen; J H Göthlin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Can ultrasound replace the intravenous urogram in preliminary investigation of renal tract disease? A prospective study.

Authors:  H G Lewis-Jones; G H Lamb; P L Hughes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Evaluation of hematuria in adults.

Authors:  J M Sutton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The diagnosis of neoplasia in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria: a decision analysis.

Authors:  H L Corwin; M D Silverstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The significance of adult hematuria: 1,000 hematuria evaluations including a risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A J Mariani; M C Mariani; C Macchioni; U K Stams; A Hariharan; A Moriera
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Renal carcinomas missed by urography.

Authors:  D A Glen; F J Gilbert; A P Bayliss
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-05
  6 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Bilal Chughtai; Hassan Ghomrawi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  [Microscopic hematuria : Reasonable and risk-adapted diagnostic evaluation].

Authors:  N Löbig; F Wezel; T Martini; B Schröppel; C Bolenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Ultrasonography of the kidneys, retroperitoneal space and urinary bladder : Importance for urologists in hospitals and medical practice].

Authors:  Thomas Büttner; Manuel Ritter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Prospective evaluation of interobserver diagnostic agreement for focal urinary bladder wall abnormalities detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  G Francica; F Scarano; S A Bellini; A Miragliuolo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-12-03

6.  [Tumor markers for bladder cancer: up-to-date study by the Kiel Tumor Bank].

Authors:  S Hautmann; J Eggers; H Meyhoff; D Melchior; A Munk; M Hamann; M Naumann; P M Braun; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  [Urine-based diagnostics: an update on the Kiel Tumor Bank].

Authors:  S Hautmann; V B L Lokeshwar; K P Juenemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Accuracy of ultrasound vs computed tomography scan for upper urinary tract malignancies and development of a risk-based diagnostic algorithm for haematuria in a UK tertiary centre.

Authors:  Rotimi A David; B James; D Adeloye; P Bose; B Rai; G V KandaSwamy
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Haematuria: an imaging guide.

Authors:  Fiachra Moloney; Kevin P Murphy; Maria Twomey; Owen J O'Connor; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-07-17

Review 10.  Imaging and Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo K Wong; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Corey T Jensen; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.