Literature DB >> 12092638

Comparisons of hemodialysis and CAPD in patients over 65 years of age: a meta-analysis.

R Selgas1, A Cirugeda, A Fernandez-Perpén, J A Sánchez-Tomero, G Barril, V Alvarez, M A Bajo.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis had the aim of studying the available studies on comparison between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in the elderly. The final objective was to reach, if possible, evidence for potential differences. In the case that no differences could be demonstrated, contribute to accept that HD and PD are similar techniques to be offered to elderly people requiring dialysis. The question formulated was this: Do we have adequately contrasted data on results for survival, hospitalization rate, quality of life and morbidity on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the elderly (more than 65 years old)? As data sources we selected eight papers that compared the general results of these two dialysis techniques. Different elements were considered in this selection because none reached the two first levels in the hierarchy of sources of evidence, and only two reached the third level--that of prospective studies; this is because an oral presentation of data has been included in a meta-analysis. Another four papers--uni- or multicenter retrospective studies compared the results obtained with PD and HD. The remaining two papers--reports from nationwide registries that compare of mortality rates, adjusted for co-morbid conditions and age, present specific results on groups of elderly patients. Three papers compare particular aspects of the two techniques, including nutritional status, psychiatric and psychosocial aspects and rehabilitation, in this case comparing PD with home hemodialysis patients. Finally, we have included the opinions of healthy elderly people on dialysis issues. This meta-analysis of these different studies suggests that the mortality and hospitalization rate of elderly people treated by PD is similar to that of similar people treated by HD. In consequence, we have no reasons to select either therapy on behalf of the patient. The nephrologist should consider and inform the patient and family about the relative advantages and disadvantages of both techniques and tailor dialysis technique choice to the specific individual to assure the best results. Local circumstances should also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12092638     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015268307680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based nephrology.

Authors:  M Haugh; D Fouque
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; J Moran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Comparison of mortality risk by choice of CAPD versus hemodialysis among elderly patients.

Authors:  N M Lunde; F K Port; R A Wolfe; K E Guire
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1991

5.  A four-year comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis: a preliminary report.

Authors:  S B Kurtz; W J Johnson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  CAPD viability: a long-term comparison with hemodialysis.

Authors:  R Maiorca; G C Cancarini; R Zubani; C Camerini; L Manili; G Brunori; E Movilli
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Comparing outcomes in renal replacement therapy: how should we correct for case mix?

Authors:  I H Khan; M K Campbell; D Cantarovich; G R Catto; C Delcroix; N Edward; C Fontenaille; H W van Hamersvelt; I S Henderson; R A Koene; M Papadimitriou; E Ritz; C Ramsay; D Tsakiris; A M MacLeod
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Ten years experience of renal replacement treatment in the elderly.

Authors:  F Malberti; F Conte; A Limido; D Marcelli; D Spotti; F Lonati; F Locatelli
Journal:  Geriatr Nephrol Urol       Date:  1997

9.  Outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: 4-year analysis of a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  R Gokal; C Jakubowski; J King; L Hunt; S Bogle; R Baillod; F Marsh; C Ogg; D Oliver; M Ward
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: comparison of patient mortality with adjustment for comorbid conditions.

Authors:  P J Held; F K Port; M N Turenne; D S Gaylin; R J Hamburger; R A Wolfe
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Dialysis Modality and Mortality in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seung Seok Han; Jae Yoon Park; Soohee Kang; Kyoung Hoon Kim; Dong-Ryeol Ryu; Hyunwook Kim; Kwon Wook Joo; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim; Dong Ki Kim
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Hospital admissions in elderly patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yijuan Sun; Hussein Kassam; Muniru Adeniyi; Milagros Martinez; Emmanuel I Agaba; Aideloje Onime; Karen S Servilla; Dominic S C Raj; Glen H Murata; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus hospital or home haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease in adults.

Authors:  L Vale; J Cody; S Wallace; C Daly; M Campbell; A Grant; I Khan; C Donaldson; A Macleod
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

4.  Patient outcome in primary peritoneal dialysis patients versus those transferred from hemodialysis and transplantation.

Authors:  Iraj Najafi; Mostafa Hosseini; Shahnaz Atabac; Hushang Sanadgol; Nader Nouri Majelan; Shiva Seirafian; Massih Naghibi; Khadigeh Makhdoumi; Fereshteh Saddadi; Tayebeh Soleymanian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Quality of life in the elderly patients on dialysis.

Authors:  Theofanis Apostolou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Risk of Stroke in Elderly Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Seung Seok Han; Dong Ryeol Ryu; Kwon Wook Joo; Chun Soo Lim; Yong Lim Kim; Shin Wook Kang; Yon Su Kim; Dong Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.