Literature DB >> 12092593

Immunohistochemical comparison of uterine papillary serous and papillary endometrioid carcinoma: clues to pathogenesis.

R I Demopoulos1, A F Mesia, K Mittal, E Vamvakas.   

Abstract

Twenty-four predominantly papillary carcinomas of the endometrium, 10 serous and 14 endometrioid, were compared using a variety of immunohistochemical antibodies, including p53, estrogen and progesterone receptors, carcinoembryonic antigen, and E-cadherin. These were selected to attempt to find clues to explain the disparate behavior of these two tumor subtypes. We found that 6 of 8 (75%) serous carcinomas had a p53 reactivity score of 300, whereas 90% of endometrioid tumors had a p53 reactivity score of less than 20 (p = 0.0008). Combined estrogen and progesterone hormone reactivity was positive in 13 (100%) of endometrioid lesions compared with 4 of 8 (50%) of serous lesions (p = 0.0117). The significantly greater p53 expression and its significantly diminished hormone receptor expression indicate that papillary serous carcinomas belong to the type II group of endometrial carcinomas that occur in a background of atrophic endometrium, are high grade, present with high stage disease, and have a poor prognosis. In contrast, papillary endometrioid carcinomas, which belong to type I carcinomas, often arise in a background of estrogen-stimulated endometrial hyperplasia, are usually well-differentiated, and have a good prognosis. Early p53 mutations in papillary serous carcinoma as well as in endometrial intraepithelial serous carcinoma may partially explain their proclivity for early intra-abdominal dissemination. Carcinoembryonic antigen expression was similar in both groups and therefore is not useful to characterize possible differences in the cell of origin. The reactivity scores for E-cadherin were also similar in the two tumor subtypes, thus not supporting the hypothesis that decreased cell to cell adhesion molecules might contribute to early dissemination of serous lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12092593     DOI: 10.1097/00004347-199907000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  6 in total

1.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

2.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer.

Authors:  J Julie Kim; Takeshi Kurita; Serdar E Bulun
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Involvements of Estrogen Receptor, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen and p53 in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Development in Donryu Rats.

Authors:  Midori Yoshida; Shin-Ichi Katsuda; Akihiko Maekawa
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Endometrial Glandular Dysplasia (EmGD): morphologically and biologically distinctive putative precursor lesions of Type II endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.