Literature DB >> 12091685

Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer.

Mark A Helvie1, Janet E Bailey, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Helen A Pass, Alfred E Chang, Lori J Pierce, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate findings from routine mammographic screenings in patients with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 25-month study period, 214 consecutive screening mammograms in 113 asymptomatic women (mean age, 51 years) with TRAM flap reconstructions were obtained. Mastectomies were performed for cancer in 106 (94%) of the 113 women and for prophylaxis in seven (6%). Prospectively, a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment category 1-5 was assigned to each mammogram. Surgical, medical, pathologic, and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed. CIs were determined by the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
RESULTS: Seven (3%) of 214 examinations were BI-RADS category 4 or 5. Six (86%) of seven patients underwent biopsy. Two (33%) of these six biopsies demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma. Cancer detection rate for mammography was 1.9% (two of 106) (95% CI: 0.33%, 7.32%) for women with reconstruction for breast cancer during the 2-year period. One (6%) of 16 BI-RADS category 3 examinations later proved to be invasive ductal carcinoma at follow-up. No interval cancer was discovered in 171 cases of BI-RADS category 1 or 2 examinations with 1-year follow-up. No cancers occurred in women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy. A biopsy positive predictive value of 33% (95% CI: 6%, 76%) was observed.
CONCLUSION: Screening mammography of TRAM flap-reconstructed breasts enables detection of nonpalpable cancer before clinical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091685     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241010061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 2.  Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Erika J Schneble; Frederick L Flynt; Michael N Clemenshaw; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Chris Gallagher; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Nathan M Shumway
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Breast cancer recurrences in myocutaneous flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Hannah L Chung; Jessica W T Leung
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  MRI for breast cancer: Current indications.

Authors:  Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

6.  DIEAP Flap Breast Reconstruction Followed by Local Recurrence of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Julia V M Huiskes; Mariël E Keemers-Gels; Jan Fabré; Luc J A Strobbe
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2018-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.