Literature DB >> 12091662

Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography.

Martin R Prince1, Shalini G Chabra, Richard Watts, Catherine Z Chen, Priscilla A Winchester, Neil M Khilnani, David Trost, Harry A Bush, K Craig Kent, Yi Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review time-resolved two-dimensional projection magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic data to characterize the passage of gadolinium-based contrast material down the leg arteries in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 87 consecutive standardized peripheral MR angiographic examinations were retrospectively reviewed to determine contrast material arrival times to the common femoral artery (CFA), the popliteal and tibial arteries, and the corresponding veins. Travel times were correlated with clinical data obtained with retrospective chart review and predictive multiparameter models developed with stepwise linear regression.
RESULTS: The mean travel time of contrast material to the CFA was 24 seconds +/- 6 (SD), with additional 5 seconds +/- 2 to reach the popliteal artery and 7 seconds +/- 4 to reach the ankle artery. The mean time window of arterial enhancement was 49 seconds +/- 10 in the pelvis, 45 seconds +/- 10 in the thigh, and 35 seconds +/- 14 in the calf. The travel time to CFA was correlated with aortic aneurysm (r = 0.41; P <.001), increasing age (r = 0.31; P =.003), male sex (r = 0.3; P =.005), myocardial infarction (r = 0.26; P =.016), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (r = -0.22; P =.041). Predicted travel time to CFA was 10.6 seconds, plus 0.143 seconds times patient age, plus 4.8 seconds if aneurysm was present, plus 3.8 seconds if male sex, plus 2.8 seconds if history of myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSION: Contrast material injected intravenously traveled rapidly down the peripheral arteries at approximately 6 seconds per station, but a long arterial phase time window allowed bolus-chase peripheral MR angiography to function with slower table stepping. Patient-to-patient variations in contrast material kinetics may be anticipated on the basis of age, sex, and clinical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091662     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf station at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of non-enhanced ECG-gated flow-dependent MRA, continuous table movement MRA and time-resolved MRA.

Authors:  Stefan Haneder; Ulrike I Attenberger; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries.

Authors:  R Schmitt; G Coblenz; O Cherevatyy; H Brunner; S Fröhner; E Wedell; G Karg; G Christopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effects of injection rate and dose on image quality in time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using 1.0M contrast agents.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Henrik J Michaely; Martin Requardt; Martin Rohrer; Scott Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the arteries of the hand. A comparison between an extracellular and an intravascular contrast agent.

Authors:  Clemens Reisinger; Thomas Gluecker; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob; Georg Bongartz; Deniz Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Time-of-arrival mapping at three-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Time-resolved bolus-chase MR angiography with real-time triggering of table motion.

Authors:  Casey P Johnson; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; James F Glockner; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis.

Authors:  U Rozzanigo; A Tagliani; E Vittorini; R Pacchioni; L Renzi Brivio; R Caudana
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.