Literature DB >> 12090863

Noncardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II).

Stephen Hulley1, Curt Furberg, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Jane Cauley, Deborah Grady, William Haskell, Robert Knopp, Maureen Lowery, Suzanne Satterfield, Helmut Schrott, Eric Vittinghoff, Donald Hunninghake.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) was a randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin therapy after menopause.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of long-term postmenopausal hormone therapy on common noncardiovascular disease outcomes. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 4.1 years' duration (HERS) and subsequent open-label observational follow-up for 2.7 years (HERS II), carried out between 1993 and 2000 in outpatient and community settings at 20 US clinical centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2763 postmenopausal women with coronary disease and average age of 67 years at enrollment in HERS; 2321 women (93% of those surviving) consented to follow-up in HERS II. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 0.625 mg/d of conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 1380) or placebo (n = 1383) during HERS; open-label hormone therapy was prescribed at personal physicians' discretion during HERS II. The proportions with at least 80% adherence to hormones declined from 81% (year 1) to 45% (year 6) in the hormone group and increased from 0% (year 1) to 8% (year 6) in the placebo group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thromboembolic events, biliary tract surgery, cancer, fracture, and total mortality.
RESULTS: Comparing women assigned to hormone therapy with those assigned to placebo, the unadjusted intention-to-treat relative hazard (RH) for venous thromboembolism declined from 2.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-5.04) during HERS to 1.40 (95% CI, 0.64-3.05) during HERS II (P for time trend =.08); it was 2.08 overall for the 6.8 years (95% CI, 1.28-3.40), and 3 of the 73 women with thromboembolism died within 30 days due to pulmonary embolism. The overall RH for biliary tract surgery was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.12-1.95); for any cancer, 1.19 (95% CI, 0.95-1.50); and for any fracture, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.87-1.25). There were 261 deaths among those assigned to hormone therapy and 239 among those assigned to placebo (RH, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.92-1.31). Adjusted and as-treated analyses did not alter our conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for 6.8 years with estrogen plus progestin in older women with coronary disease increased the rates of venous thromboembolism and biliary tract surgery. Trends in other disease outcomes were not favorable and should be assessed in larger trials and in broader populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12090863     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.1.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  110 in total

1.  Estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  [Risk and benefits of hormone replacement therapy by postmenopausal women. WHI-Study].

Authors:  V Heinemann; K Parhofer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Making decisions about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Janice Rymer; Ruth Wilson; Karen Ballard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

4.  [Evidence based basis of decision making for or against a postmenopausal hormone treatment].

Authors:  Eva Rásky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-07-31       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  [Should the menopause be treated?].

Authors:  E Bailón
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Dose-dependent toxic effects of high-dose estrogen on renal and cardiac injury in surgically postmenopausal mice.

Authors:  Xiaomei Meng; Xiangguo Dai; Tang-Dong Liao; Martin D'Ambrosio; Fangfei Wang; James J Yang; Xiao-Ping Yang
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Menopausal hormone therapy and risks of colorectal adenomas and cancers in the French E3N prospective cohort: true associations or bias?

Authors:  Sophie Morois; Agnès Fournier; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Sylvie Mesrine; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  E4F1, a novel estrogen-responsive gene in possible atheroprotection, revealed by microarray analysis.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Nakamura; Katsuhide Igarashi; Takashi Suzuki; Jun Kanno; Tohru Inoue; Chika Tazawa; Masayuki Saruta; Tomoko Ando; Noriko Moriyama; Toru Furukawa; Masao Ono; Takuya Moriya; Kiyoshi Ito; Haruo Saito; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Hormone therapy for the prevention of bone loss in menopausal women with osteopenia: is it a viable option?

Authors:  Mary H Hohenhaus; Kelly A McGarry; Nananda F Col
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Validation of a decision model for preventive pharmacological strategies in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Carey Levinton; Claudine Laurier; Yola Moride; Louis-Georges Ste-Marie; Ralph Crott
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.