Literature DB >> 12090586

Superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a report of 20 cases of a process that may be confused with endocervical glandular dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.

P M Baker1, P B Clement, D A Bell, R H Young.   

Abstract

Twenty cases of superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix that occurred in patients from 20 to 51 (mean 37.1) years of age are described. The majority of the cases were seen in consultation and were usually referred because of diagnostic problems; endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, or rarely invasive adenocarcinoma were a frequent consideration of the contributor. The endometriosis was almost always an incidental microscopic finding. The endometriotic foci were usually confined to the superficial third of the cervical wall, but in one case there was also involvement of the middle third of the cervical wall. Deep cervical endometriosis was not present in any case. The endometriotic glands were typically evenly spaced and were surrounded at least focally by endometriotic stroma in all cases. The endometriotic stromal cells, however, were significantly obscured by inflammatory cells (two cases), inflammatory cells and hemorrhage (two cases), hemorrhage (four cases), and in one case by smooth muscle metaplasia causing initial failure to recognize the stromal component of the process. The presence of mitotic figures in the glandular epithelium contributed to an initial diagnosis of a premalignant or malignant glandular lesion being made or seriously entertained in 10 cases. Awareness that mitotic figures may be conspicuous in endometriosis from women of reproductive age, the usually bland cytologic features of the endometriotic epithelium, and the presence of associated endometrial stromal cells all facilitate establishing the correct diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12090586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  8 in total

1.  Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?

Authors:  Petra M Casey; Margaret E Long; Mary L Marnach
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Adenomyosis: from the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: a pictorial review.

Authors:  A L Valentini; S Speca; B Gui; G Soglia; B G Soglia; M Miccò; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Endocervical glandular lesions: controversial aspects and ancillary techniques.

Authors:  W G McCluggage
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a case report.

Authors:  Han Moie Park; Sang Soo Lee; Dae Woon Eom; Gil Hyun Kang; Sang Wook Yi; Woo Seok Sohn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Frozen-section evaluation of cervical adenocarcinoma at time of radical trachelectomy: pathologic pitfalls and the application of an objective scoring system.

Authors:  Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow; Yukio Sonoda; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Persistent bleeding after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kirsten J Sasaki; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Suela Sulo; Charles E Miller
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Endometriosis mimicking glandular atypia in a cervical cytology.

Authors:  Paula A Rodriguez-Urrego; Isabel C Dulcey-Hormiga; Luis E Barrera-Herrera; David A Suarez-Zamora; Mauricio A Palau-Lazaro; Catalina Buritica-Cifuentes
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Endocervical Adenocarcinoma, Gross Examination, and Processing, Including Intraoperative Evaluation: Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Anais Malpica; Esther Oliva; Gian Franco Zannoni; Pedro T Ramirez; Joseph T Rabban
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.326

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.