Literature DB >> 12088600

A questionnaire study of GPs' and patients' beliefs about the different components of patient centredness.

Jane Ogden1, Lucy Ambrose, Abbas Khadra, Sushma Manthri, Lorrie Symons, Alex Vass, Michelle Williams.   

Abstract

Much research has explored the interaction between doctor and patient in the consultation and patient centredness has generally emerged as the preferred mode of consultation style. The present study aimed to examine and compare general practitioners' (GPs) and patients' beliefs about the importance of the different aspects of patient centred behaviour in a consultation. Matched questionnaires were completed by 410 patients (response rate=76.5%) and 64 GPs (response rate=85.3%) from practices around London concerning aspects of patient centredness operationalized in terms of doctor receptiveness, patient involvement, the affective content of the relationship and information giving. The results showed that GPs and patients showed similar beliefs about involving the patient in decision making, aspects of doctor receptiveness and the importance of the patient's own feelings in the consultation. However, GPs believed that it was less important to focus only on the patient's main problem, and more important to acknowledge their own feelings and avoid medical language. Further, GPs rated doctor receptiveness and the affective content of the relationship overall as more important for a good consultation than the patients. The patients also consistently rated information giving as more important than the GPs. To conclude, GPs rated the doctor receptiveness and affective components of patient centredness as more important than patients whereas patients showed greater endorsement of information indicating that although patient centredness may currently be the preferred style of consultation, doctors and patients prefer different aspects of this behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088600     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00200-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  19 in total

1.  Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R J McManus; J Mant; A Roalfe; R A Oakes; S Bryan; H M Pattison; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-22

2.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Do standardised patients lose their confidence in primary medical care? Personal experiences of standardised patients with GPs.

Authors:  Martin Sielk; Silke Brockmann; Christa Spannaus-Sakic; Stefan Wilm
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Brief report: Training internists in shared decision making about chronic opioid treatment for noncancer pain.

Authors:  Mark D Sullivan; Janis Leigh; Barak Gaster
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patients' experiences and expectations of general practice: a questionnaire study of differences by ethnic group.

Authors:  Jane Ogden; Asha Jain
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Arild Aakvik
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  When doctors disagree: a qualitative study of doctors' and parents' views on the risks of childhood food allergy.

Authors:  Wendy Hu; Carol Grbich; Andrew Kemp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Physician-Pharmacist Collaboration Intervention to Improve Blood Pressure Control.

Authors:  Linnea A Polgreen; Jayoung Han; Barry L Carter; Gail P Ardery; Christopher S Coffey; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Paul A James
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Elective surgical referral guidelines--background educational material or essential shared decision making tool? A survey of GPs' in England.

Authors:  Naomi Blundell; Sian Taylor-Phillips; David Spitzer; Steven Martin; Ian Forde; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Information and shared decision-making are top patients' priorities.

Authors:  Ami Schattner; Alexander Bronstein; Navah Jellin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.