Literature DB >> 12088472

Ovarian cancer: patterns of care in Victoria during 1993-1995.

Marisa Grossi1, Michael A Quinn, Vicky J Thursfield, Prudence A Francis, Robert M Rome, Robert S Planner, Graham G Giles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of and outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer during 1993, 1994 and 1995 in Victoria. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study conducted by surveying doctors involved in managing incident ovarian cancer cases identified from the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry. The survey was conducted in 1997 and the cohort was followed up until the end of 1999 to obtain at least four years of follow-up data on all patients. PATIENTS: All women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed during 1993, 1994 and 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported management in terms of staging, treatment and survival.
RESULTS: Management details were obtained for 84.5% (562/665) of eligible patients. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range, 22-98 years). Surgery was the primary therapy in 77.2% of women (434/562). Only one in three women had adequate surgery, which was less likely to be performed by general gynaecologists and general surgeons than gynaecological oncologists (21.3% [35/164] v 13.3% [8/60] v 52% [105/202]). After surgery 78.6% of women (341/434) received chemotherapy, usually with platinum-based regimens. The overall five-year relative survival was 46% for women treated surgically; poor survival was related to increasing age, later tumour stage, presence of ascites, residual disease > 2 cm and poorer histological differentiation of the tumour.
CONCLUSIONS: For optimal care a preoperative carcinoma antigen (CA)-125 assay, chest x-ray and pelvic ultrasound should be performed, and early referral to a multi-disciplinary unit for definitive surgery is advised. Every effort should be made to adequately stage or debulk the tumour. Women with high-risk early-stage and advanced disease should be considered for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088472     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04616.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  3 in total

Review 1.  Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Yin Ling Woo; Maria Kyrgiou; Andrew Bryant; Thomas Everett; Heather O Dickinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 2.  The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; Pablo Padilla-Iserte; Cristina Zorrero
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Developing an Australian multi-module clinical quality registry for gynaecological cancers: a protocol paper.

Authors:  Natalie Heriot; Alison Brand; Paul Cohen; Sue Hegarty; Simon Hyde; Yee Leung; John R Zalcberg; Robert Rome
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.