Literature DB >> 12088336

Serum tumor marker CA 125 for monitoring ovarian cancer during follow-up.

M K Tuxen1, G Sölétormos, P Dombernowsky.   

Abstract

CA 125 is currently widely applied in the management of patients with ovarian cancer. However, a change in results of CA 125, which should be considered significant, has not been defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of CA 125 to signal progressive ovarian cancer during follow-up after first-line chemotherapy. The study patients were selected retrospectively among 255 patients with stage IC-IV ovarian cancer. The evaluation of the CA 125 information was based on the analytical imprecision, the normal intra-individual biological variation, the sampling interval, and the cut-off value. Additionally, the utility of a new assessment criterion based upon an increment of 2.5 times the baseline CA 125 concentration confirmed by a third measurement was investigated. The efficiency of CA 125 to identify progression and non-progression during follow-up varied between 76.5 and 79.9%, depending on the applied time limit for an acceptable positive lead time. The median lead time for true positive results was 95-99.5 days. Using the new elaborated criterion, the efficiency of CA 125 for identifying progression and non-progression varied between 75.7 and 78.5%, depending on the applied time limit for an acceptable positive lead time. The median lead time for true positive results was 91-95.5 days. CA 125 provided early and reliable information about progressive disease during follow-up. The applied criteria can therefore be recommended in further studies assessing the clinical utility of serological tumor markers in patients with ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088336     DOI: 10.1080/003655102317475434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of follow-up strategies for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.

Authors:  Fiona Kew; Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer: the duplicity of CA125 measurement.

Authors:  Amer K Karam; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Evaluation of ovarian cancer remission markers HE4, MMP7 and Mesothelin by comparison to the established marker CA125.

Authors:  Michèl Schummer; Charles Drescher; Robin Forrest; Shirley Gough; Jason Thorpe; Ingegerd Hellström; Karl Erik Hellström; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Kallikrein family proteases KLK6 and KLK7 are potential early detection and diagnostic biomarkers for serous and papillary serous ovarian cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Ayala Tamir; Ushma Jag; Sreeja Sarojini; Craig Schindewolf; Takemi Tanaka; Rajendra Gharbaran; Hiren Patel; Anil Sood; Wei Hu; Ruzeen Patwa; Patrick Blake; Polina Chirina; Jin Oh Jeong; Heejin Lim; Andre Goy; Andrew Pecora; K Stephen Suh
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Pre-operative Circulating Plasma Gelsolin Predicts Residual Disease and Detects Early Stage Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Meshach Asare-Werehene; Laudine Communal; Euridice Carmona; Tien Le; Diane Provencher; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Benjamin K Tsang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Apatinib treatment efficiently delays biochemical-only recurrent ovarian cancer progression.

Authors:  Zhongyu Wang; Yake Huang; Ling Long; Li Zhou; Yan Huang; Lei Gan; Aimin Pu; Sufen Li; Rongkai Xie
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.234

7.  The serine protease prostasin (PRSS8) is a potential biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ayala Tamir; Anju Gangadharan; Sakshi Balwani; Takemi Tanaka; Ushma Patel; Ahmed Hassan; Stephanie Benke; Agnieszka Agas; Joseph D'Agostino; Dayoung Shin; Sunghoon Yoon; Andre Goy; Andrew Pecora; K Stephen Suh
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  Identification of high-risk patients by human epididymis protein 4 levels during follow-up of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Karina Dahl Steffensen; Marianne Waldstrøm; Ivan Brandslund; Bente Lund; Sarah Mejer Sørensen; Max Petzold; Anders Jakobsen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers.

Authors:  György Sölétormos; Michael J Duffy; Suher Othman Abu Hassan; René H M Verheijen; Bengt Tholander; Robert C Bast; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Catharine M Sturgeon; Johannes M Bonfrer; Per Hyltoft Petersen; Hugo Troonen; Gian CarloTorre; Jan Kanty Kulpa; Malgorzata K Tuxen; Raphael Molina
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Performance of seven criteria to assess CA125 increments among ovarian cancer patients monitored during first-line chemotherapy and the post-therapy follow-up period.

Authors:  Suher O Abu Hassan; Dorte L Nielsen; Malgorzata K Tuxen; Per H Petersen; György Sölétormos
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2017-07-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.