Literature DB >> 12088251

Palliative treatment of malignant refractory ascites by positioning of Denver peritoneovenous shunt.

Claudio Zanon1, Maurizio Grosso, Fabrizio Aprà, Renzo Clara, Massimiliano Bortolini, Francesco Quaglino, Silvia Cornaglia, Paolo Simone.   

Abstract

Malignant ascites is relatively common in patients with certain types of end-stage cancer. Traditional treatments based on fluid and salt restriction and diuretic therapy often are not able to contain neoplastic ascites. These patients consequently undergo repeated abdominal paracentesis, with further plasma protein loss and risk of injury to abdominal viscera. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with Denver peritoneovenous shunt and the outcome of patients with malignant ascites and suggest some modifications to improve device patency. From February 1997 to December 1999, 44 Denver peritoneovenous shunts were placed in 42 patients, 17 women and 25 men, aged between 38 and 77 years (mean, 62.3), affected with malignant ascites due to advanced abdominal cancer. At the time of admission, 72% of patients had pain, 88% dysphagia, 66% nausea and/or vomiting, and 83% dyspnea. Eleven patients underwent local anesthesia with lidocaine and 33 general anesthesia with rapidly metabolized drugs. In 27 cases we used the peritoneal-internal jugular right vein surgical approach and in 3 cases the peritoneal-femoral vein surgical access, joining the saphena vein to the cross. In 10 cases, a radiological positioning of the Denver peritoneovenous shunt was effected by a trans-subclavian access. Relief of ascites symptoms was obtained in 87.5% of cases, with reduction of dyspnea, an increased appetite and improved ambulation. Denver peritoneovenous shunt is a good device to relieve malignant ascites, thereby reducing the risk of complications and the number of hospital admissions due to repeated paracentesis and consequently improving the quality of life. A careful patient selection, an accurate follow-up and some device modifications could improve the shunt performance, allowing a wider application of the Denver peritoneovenous shunt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088251     DOI: 10.1177/030089160208800208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  6 in total

Review 1.  Permanent catheters for recurrent ascites-a critical and systematic review of study methodology.

Authors:  Lars Christensen; Lorna Wildgaard; Kim Wildgaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Outpatient Intraperitoneal Catumaxomab Therapy for Malignant Ascites Related to Advanced Gynecologic Neoplasms.

Authors:  Christian Martin Kurbacher; Olympia Horn; Jutta Anna Kurbacher; Susanne Herz; Ann Tabea Kurbacher; Ralf Hildenbrand; Reinhardt Bollmann
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 3.  Symptomatic Fluid Drainage: Peritoneovenous Shunt Placement.

Authors:  Hooman Yarmohammadi; George I Getrajdman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Safety and efficacy of the PleurX catheter for the treatment of malignant ascites.

Authors:  Govindarajan Narayanan; Amir Pezeshkmehr; Shree Venkat; Gabriella Guerrero; Katuzka Barbery
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Feasibility of externalized peritoneovenous shunt (EPVS) for malignant ascites.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tokue; Yoshito Takeuchi; Yasuaki Arai; Keitaro Sofue; Noriaki Sakamoto; Yoshito Tsushima; Keigo Endo
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Drainage of malignant ascites: patient selection and perspectives.

Authors:  Maciej Stukan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.989

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.