Literature DB >> 12087922

In vitro and in vivo equivalence of two oral atenolol tablet formulations.

Antonio Cuadrado1, Alicia Rodríguez Gascón, Rose María Hernández, Ana María Castilla, Ane de la Maza, Alicia López de Ocáriz, Begoña Calvo, José Luis Pedraz.   

Abstract

A randomised, cross-over, open study of bioequivalence between two different atenolol (CAS 29122-68-7) tablet formulations is presented. An in vitro comparative study between the two formulations was also performed. Both products meet the USP 23 (United States Pharmacopea) specification. The values of similarity factor (f2) and difference factor (f1) obtained ensure sameness or equivalence of the two dissolution curves. Twenty-four healthy volunteers (male/female) participated in the bioequivalence study. Each treatment was given as a single 100-mg tablet following an overnight fast. Atenolol concentrations in plasma were determined up to 30 h after treatment by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity, Cmax and Cmax/AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence after logarithmic transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.06 (0.99-1.13) for AUC, 1.07 (0.97-1.18) for Cmax, and 0.99 (0.94-1.07) for Cmax/AUC0-infinity. The 90% CI for tmax was 0.91-1.23. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations. A discrete fall in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was observed after the drug administration. The fall extent (approximately 11 mmHg in supine position) and the time course of both parameters after the drug administration was similar for both formulations. Minimal values for SBP and DBP were achieved at 6 h after the drug administration for both formulations. Heart rates were also reduced after the administration of both formulations of atenolol in a similar extent (12 b.p.m.) and following a similar time profile (i.e. maximal reductions were observed between 1 and 3 h after the drug administration). It can be concluded that both formulations are equivalent in vitro and in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12087922     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  3 in total

1.  Simple and rapid HPLC method for simultaneous determination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in spiked human plasma.

Authors:  Mohamed S Elgawish; Samia M Mostafa; Abdalla A Elshanawane
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Differences in brand versus generic esmolol in the treatment of perioperative supraventricular tachycardia and hypertension: A pilot study.

Authors:  Diamanto Aretha; Panagiotis Kiekkas; Nektarios Sioulas; Fotini Fligou
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 3.  Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Maria Elena Flacco; Stefania Boccia; Elvira D'Andrea; Nikola Panic; Carolina Marzuillo; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Paolo Villari; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 8.082

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.