Literature DB >> 12086999

Complexity of environment and parsimony of decision rules in insect societies.

Claire Detrain1, Jean-Louis Deneubourg.   

Abstract

This paper shows how colonies of social insects process information and solve problems in a complex environment, while keeping some parsimony at the level of the individuals' decision rules. Two studies on ant foraging reveal the diversity of adaptive colony-level patterns that can be generated through self-organization, based on the same individual-level recruitment rules. Regarding prey scavenging, the "ability to retrieve the prey" rule accounts for changes in foraging patterns, with increasing prey size, that show all stages intermediate between an individual and a mass exploitation of food resources. Regarding liquid food foraging, the "ability to ingest a desired volume" rule enables a colony to adjust the number of tending ants to the honeydew production of aphids. In both cases, decision rules are based on intelligent criteria that intrinsically integrate information on multiple variables that are relevant to the ants. Furthermore, the environment can contribute directly to the emergence of collective patterns, independently of any individual behavioral changes. Each environmental factor, including abiotic ones, that alters the dynamics of information transfer in group-living animals should be reconsidered not simply as a constraint but also as a part of the decision-making process and as a agent that shapes the collective pattern.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12086999     DOI: 10.2307/1543478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Bull        ISSN: 0006-3185            Impact factor:   1.818


  10 in total

1.  The emergence of collective foraging in the arboreal Gnamptogenys menadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Christine A Johnson; Els Lommelen; Diane Allard; Bruno Gobin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-06-26

2.  Excavated substrate modulates growth instability during nest building in ants.

Authors:  Etienne Toffin; Jonathan Kindekens; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Amé; José Halloy; Colette Rivault; Claire Detrain; Jean Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The feeding dynamics of broiler chickens.

Authors:  L M Collins; D J T Sumpter
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Key physical wood properties in termite foraging decisions.

Authors:  Sebastian Oberst; Joseph C S Lai; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  The principles of collective animal behaviour.

Authors:  D J T Sumpter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Substrate temperature constrains recruitment and trail following behavior in ants.

Authors:  Louise van Oudenhove; Raphaël Boulay; Alain Lenoir; Carlos Bernstein; Xim Cerda
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Key factors for the emergence of collective decision in invertebrates.

Authors:  Raphaël Jeanson; Audrey Dussutour; Vincent Fourcassié
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Sting, Carry and Stock: How Corpse Availability Can Regulate De-Centralized Task Allocation in a Ponerine Ant Colony.

Authors:  Thomas Schmickl; Istvan Karsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dominance-discovery and discovery-exploitation trade-offs promote diversity in ant communities.

Authors:  Louise van Oudenhove; Xim Cerdá; Carlos Bernstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.