INTRODUCTION: Surgical quality control in the form of multicentre studies make it possible to analyse the treatment status of a given surgical illness under quality assurance aspects. MATERIAL/ METHODS: On 1. 1. 2000, under the patronage of the Convent of Hospital Chief Surgeons a project (ongoing) - organised and conducted by the Institute for Quality Management in Operative Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg - was initiated to document and collect the data of patients with colorectal cancer throughout the whole of Germany. This work is supported by the German Society of Surgery, and the Surgical Working Group, Quality Assurance within the German Society of Surgery. Currently, some 282 hospitals throughout the country are involved in establishing a prospective documentation of colorectal carcinoma. Participation in this study is on a voluntary basis. The anonymity of both patients and hospitals is guaranteed, and no hospitals wishing to participate are excluded. Both operatively and conservatively treated patients are being documented, and no randomization takes place. RESULTS: In the year 2000, the participating hospitals documented a total of 9 477 patients with a colorectal carcinoma, including 6 975 patients with a carcinoma of the colon, and 3 402 with a rectal carcinoma. The average age of the patients was 68.5 years, and there were 5 010 men and 4 467 women. The operation rate was 99.2 %, the resection rate 95.6 %. The abdominoperineal resection rate was 27.4 %. The indicators for diagnostic quality as set out by Hermanek were largely complied with, but some deviations were noted. DISCUSSION: On the basis of the data collected, structures were established for a uniform Germany-wide quality management for a clinical condition with a major health policy impact. This information make it possible for the hospitals to identify and eliminate deficits in the structural and process quality in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, and in this way to improve outcome quality. This means that the results of medical care research have an immediate impact on the individual treatment received by a given patient.
INTRODUCTION: Surgical quality control in the form of multicentre studies make it possible to analyse the treatment status of a given surgical illness under quality assurance aspects. MATERIAL/ METHODS: On 1. 1. 2000, under the patronage of the Convent of Hospital Chief Surgeons a project (ongoing) - organised and conducted by the Institute for Quality Management in Operative Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg - was initiated to document and collect the data of patients with colorectal cancer throughout the whole of Germany. This work is supported by the German Society of Surgery, and the Surgical Working Group, Quality Assurance within the German Society of Surgery. Currently, some 282 hospitals throughout the country are involved in establishing a prospective documentation of colorectal carcinoma. Participation in this study is on a voluntary basis. The anonymity of both patients and hospitals is guaranteed, and no hospitals wishing to participate are excluded. Both operatively and conservatively treated patients are being documented, and no randomization takes place. RESULTS: In the year 2000, the participating hospitals documented a total of 9 477 patients with a colorectal carcinoma, including 6 975 patients with a carcinoma of the colon, and 3 402 with a rectal carcinoma. The average age of the patients was 68.5 years, and there were 5 010 men and 4 467 women. The operation rate was 99.2 %, the resection rate 95.6 %. The abdominoperineal resection rate was 27.4 %. The indicators for diagnostic quality as set out by Hermanek were largely complied with, but some deviations were noted. DISCUSSION: On the basis of the data collected, structures were established for a uniform Germany-wide quality management for a clinical condition with a major health policy impact. This information make it possible for the hospitals to identify and eliminate deficits in the structural and process quality in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, and in this way to improve outcome quality. This means that the results of medical care research have an immediate impact on the individual treatment received by a given patient.