| Literature DB >> 12085186 |
H Niizeki1, M Kobayashi, I Horiuchi, N Akakura, J Chen, J Wang, J-i Hamada, P Seth, H Katoh, H Watanabe, A Raz, M Hosokawa.
Abstract
The incidence of distant metastases is higher in the tumours with low oxygen pressure than in those with high oxygen pressure. It is well known that hypoxia induces the transcription of various genes involved in angiogenesis and anaerobic metabolism necessary for the growth of tumour cells in vivo, suggesting that hypoxia may also induce the transcription of metastasis-associated genes. We sought to identify the metastasis-associated genes differentially expressed in tumour cells under hypoxic conditions with the use of a DNA microarray system. We found that hypoxia enhanced the expression of autocrine motility factor mRNA in various cancer cells and also enhanced the random motility of pancreatic cancer cells. Autocrine motility factor inhibitors abrogated the increase of motility under hypoxic conditions. In order to explore the roles of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, we established hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-transfectants and dominant negative hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-transfectants. Transfection with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and dominant-negative hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha enhanced and suppressed the expression of autocrine motility factor/phosphohexase isomerase/neuroleukin mRNA and the random motility, respectively. These results suggest that hypoxia may promote the metastatic potential of cancer cells through the enhanced autocrine motility factor/phosphohexase isomerase/neuroleukin mRNA expression and that the disruption of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 pathway may be an effective treatment for metastasis. Copyright 2002 Cancer Research UKEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12085186 PMCID: PMC2375441 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Expression of AMF/PHI/NL and AMFR mRNAs. (A) AMF/PHI/NL mRNA expression. RNAs were extracted from the cells incubated under non-hypoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) conditions (20% and 1%, respectively) for 24 h and then Northern blot analysis was performed. (B) AMFR mRNA expression. RNAs were extracted from the cells incubated under non-hypoxic (N) for 24 h and then Northern blot analysis was performed. A representative result of two different experiments is shown. (C) FACS analysis of AMFR expression. Cells were stained with anti-AMFR antibody (rat monoclonal antibody, IgM) for 1 h and then stained with second anti-rat Ig antibody for 1 h. A representative result of two different experiments is shown.
Figure 2Expression of AMF/PHI/NL mRNA in the transfectants: (A) Northern blot analysis of AMF/PHI/NL mRNA in the HIF-1α-transfectants (PCI-10/H2 and PCI-10/H3) and vector-transfectant (PCI-10/V2) under non-hypoxic conditions. AMF/PHI/NL mRNA expression in PCI-10 cells under non-hypoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) conditions were shown as controls. (B) Northern blot analysis of dominant negative HIF-1α (dnHIF-1α) mRNA in the transfectants. (C) Northern blot analysis of AMF/PHI/NL mRNA expression in the dnHIF-1α -transfectants (PCI-43/dnH3 and PCI-43/dnH7) and the vector-transfectant (PCI-43/vV3) under non-hypoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) conditions. RNAs were extracted from the cells incubated under non-hypoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) conditions for 24 h and then Northern blot analysis was performed.
Figure 3Random motility: Data present the mean±s.d. of three different experiments. (A) Random motility of the PCI-10 cells under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. *P<0.01; significantly different compared with the relative motility of the PCI-10 cells under normoxic conditions. (B) Random motility of the HIF-1α-transfectants under non-hypoxic conditions. *P<0.01; significantly different compared with the vector control. (C) Random motility of the dnHIF-1α-transfectants and the vector-transfectant under hypoxic and non-hypoxic conditions. *P<0.05; significantly different compared with the relative motility of the PCI-43 cells under normoxic conditions. (D) Random motility of PCI-10 cells under normoxic conditions in the presence or absence of the supernatant of PCI-10 cells cultured under hypoxic conditions. *P<0.01, **P<0.05; significantly different compared with the relative motility of PCI-10 cells under normoxic conditions in the absence of supernatant. †P<0.05; significantly different compared with the relative motility of PCI-10 cells in the presence of 100% supernatant. (E) Random motility of the PCI-10 cells under hypoxic conditions in the presence of AMF/PHI-inhibitors. *P<0.01; significantly different compared with the relative motility of PCI-10 cells under normoxic conditions. †P<0.01; significantly different compared with the relative motility of PCI-10 cells under normoxic conditions in the absence of inhibitor.