BACKGROUND: In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey. RESULTS: For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors. CONCLUSION: Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages.
BACKGROUND: In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey. RESULTS: For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors. CONCLUSION: Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages.
Authors: Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F DiMartini; Daniela P Ladner; Mary Ann Simpson; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion; Jarcy Zee; Abigail R Smith; Susan Holtzman; Averell H Sherker; Robert Weinrieb; Robert A Fisher; Jean C Emond; Chris E Freise; James R Burton; Zeeshan Butt Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A DiMartini; M A Dew; Q Liu; M A Simpson; D P Ladner; A R Smith; J Zee; S Abbey; B W Gillespie; R Weinrieb; M S Mandell; R A Fisher; J C Emond; C E Freise; A H Sherker; Z Butt Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 8.086